People can and should satisfy their own wants, the state should only provide what they need. Nothing else.

Because indeed, resources are limited.

social democracy somewhat does that

and it's a success

but not socialism still

Stalin dose sound Similar to Satan!

<:troll_face:726878856585281557>

I actually agree with social democracy, I already told you. At least they’re trying to solve the problems of capitalism while not FUCKING RIOTING

i'm never a advocate for violence

regardless if i agree with you or not

Yeah, violence sucks.

What I was thinking is that the president is a honorific leader while the parliament has the real power.

The parliament, which is composed of workers. But! Here’s the big twist! What if we had *gasp* political pluralism?

Explain 😗

So basically, while the official status quo would be socialist, opposition wouldn’t really be silenced. Because we need opposition to know what mistakes we do and to improve ourselves. If the opposition wins, then they can implement their own policies and can deviate from socialism. Again, the president doesn’t have any real power over the parliament, so they can peacefully transition towards whatever else, if that’s what the people chose.

That’s a dream because a socialist party wouldn’t win democratically due to many reasons <:KEK:726877368601411624>

Isn't that what the royal family kind of was?

Ah that sounds kinda cool. 😎 Except that the leader is not a king/queen, they’re a president.

Like a figure head but without actual power

Idk sounds useless

A parliamentary republic

Like most of Europe?

That is pretty much what the UK is.

Ah, that’s cool. 😎

Monarcho-socialism actually exists <:KEK:726877368601411624>

except national identity isn't really a thing in the uk

Yes... unfortunately...

They let the radical Muslims enter the country...

i swear most people including me thinks that the monarchy is stupid

well i don't have a opinion on that

oh what about radical muslims

You know, the terrorists and the rapists who are Muslim?

i actually can't have a opinion on that it's a criminal offense technically

hate speech or whatever... i don't know how much it's policed tho

The question is, who defines hate speech and how does one regulate that?

honestly idk. don't think it's policed much

but denying freedom of speech is denying a answer for you to find truth in something

even if it is really bad. if you can't discuss it then that's kind of stupid

Honestly I think hate speech laws are stupid

But I've never experienced any

The PC religion obviously defines what hate speech is 🤣