Message from @Simpnautica

Discord ID: 795035441605640243


2021-01-02 21:01:29 UTC  

Explain 😗

2021-01-02 21:02:36 UTC  

So basically, while the official status quo would be socialist, opposition wouldn’t really be silenced. Because we need opposition to know what mistakes we do and to improve ourselves. If the opposition wins, then they can implement their own policies and can deviate from socialism. Again, the president doesn’t have any real power over the parliament, so they can peacefully transition towards whatever else, if that’s what the people chose.

2021-01-02 21:03:31 UTC  

That’s a dream because a socialist party wouldn’t win democratically due to many reasons <:KEK:726877368601411624>

2021-01-02 21:03:31 UTC  

Isn't that what the royal family kind of was?

2021-01-02 21:04:02 UTC  

Ah that sounds kinda cool. 😎 Except that the leader is not a king/queen, they’re a president.

2021-01-02 21:04:04 UTC  

Like a figure head but without actual power

2021-01-02 21:04:13 UTC  

Idk sounds useless

2021-01-02 21:04:21 UTC  

A parliamentary republic

2021-01-02 21:04:24 UTC  

Like most of Europe?

2021-01-02 21:04:31 UTC  

That is pretty much what the UK is.

2021-01-02 21:04:55 UTC  

Ah, that’s cool. 😎

2021-01-02 21:05:15 UTC  

Monarcho-socialism actually exists <:KEK:726877368601411624>

2021-01-02 21:05:16 UTC  

except national identity isn't really a thing in the uk

2021-01-02 21:05:25 UTC  

Yes... unfortunately...

2021-01-02 21:05:34 UTC  

They let the radical Muslims enter the country...

2021-01-02 21:05:41 UTC  

i swear most people including me thinks that the monarchy is stupid

2021-01-02 21:05:51 UTC  

well i don't have a opinion on that

2021-01-02 21:05:58 UTC  

oh what about radical muslims

2021-01-02 21:06:18 UTC  

You know, the terrorists and the rapists who are Muslim?

2021-01-02 21:06:34 UTC  

i actually can't have a opinion on that it's a criminal offense technically

2021-01-02 21:07:00 UTC  

hate speech or whatever... i don't know how much it's policed tho

2021-01-02 21:07:49 UTC  

The question is, who defines hate speech and how does one regulate that?

2021-01-02 21:08:06 UTC  

honestly idk. don't think it's policed much

2021-01-02 21:08:38 UTC  

but denying freedom of speech is denying a answer for you to find truth in something

2021-01-02 21:09:00 UTC  

even if it is really bad. if you can't discuss it then that's kind of stupid

2021-01-02 21:09:35 UTC  

Honestly I think hate speech laws are stupid

2021-01-02 21:09:44 UTC  

But I've never experienced any

2021-01-02 21:11:05 UTC  

The PC religion obviously defines what hate speech is 🤣

2021-01-02 21:11:42 UTC  

>_< yeah they can change the rules any day

2021-01-02 21:12:09 UTC  

Like Merriam webster changes their definitions every other day

2021-01-02 21:12:40 UTC  

my thoughts on hate speech, is it should not be regualted but condemned, it shouldn't take a genius to refrain from saying certain things that make you sound like an insensitive prick and or a douche.

2021-01-02 21:12:51 UTC  

I have redone my political compass and I’m now a moderate libertarian leftist

2021-01-02 21:12:54 UTC  

Once you control the language, you can control the narrative, therefore controlling info, and controlling the people

2021-01-02 21:12:55 UTC  

Wow.

2021-01-02 21:13:13 UTC  

It cannot be legally defined, because it is subjective in it's very nature. Lefties throw it around to try to add weight to their screeching

2021-01-02 21:13:24 UTC  

Literally 1984

2021-01-02 21:13:29 UTC  

Mhm exactly

2021-01-02 21:13:37 UTC  

Political correctness is Newspeak

2021-01-02 21:13:40 UTC  

It's happening already

2021-01-02 21:13:54 UTC  

It's been for a long long time. Slow process

2021-01-02 21:13:58 UTC  

I would argue it has not gone that far