Message from @LuckyPuffy
Discord ID: 795034333202087987
I don’t want to give everyone everything, a doctor obviously needs more and different things than a teacher, or than an artist.
Scarcity defined.
Because nobody needs everything.
Again, the needs of the people should be met, not their wants.
but, people should be allowed to strive for their wants as long as it does not deprive others of their needs
Yes, that’s a thing I can agree with, actually.
People can and should satisfy their own wants, the state should only provide what they need. Nothing else.
Because indeed, resources are limited.
social democracy somewhat does that
and it's a success
but not socialism still
Stalin dose sound Similar to Satan!
<:troll_face:726878856585281557>
I actually agree with social democracy, I already told you. At least they’re trying to solve the problems of capitalism while not FUCKING RIOTING
i'm never a advocate for violence
regardless if i agree with you or not
Yeah, violence sucks.
What I was thinking is that the president is a honorific leader while the parliament has the real power.
The parliament, which is composed of workers. But! Here’s the big twist! What if we had *gasp* political pluralism?
Explain 😗
So basically, while the official status quo would be socialist, opposition wouldn’t really be silenced. Because we need opposition to know what mistakes we do and to improve ourselves. If the opposition wins, then they can implement their own policies and can deviate from socialism. Again, the president doesn’t have any real power over the parliament, so they can peacefully transition towards whatever else, if that’s what the people chose.
That’s a dream because a socialist party wouldn’t win democratically due to many reasons <:KEK:726877368601411624>
Isn't that what the royal family kind of was?
Ah that sounds kinda cool. 😎 Except that the leader is not a king/queen, they’re a president.
Like a figure head but without actual power
Idk sounds useless
A parliamentary republic
Like most of Europe?
That is pretty much what the UK is.
Ah, that’s cool. 😎
Monarcho-socialism actually exists <:KEK:726877368601411624>
except national identity isn't really a thing in the uk
Yes... unfortunately...
They let the radical Muslims enter the country...
i swear most people including me thinks that the monarchy is stupid
well i don't have a opinion on that
oh what about radical muslims
You know, the terrorists and the rapists who are Muslim?
i actually can't have a opinion on that it's a criminal offense technically
hate speech or whatever... i don't know how much it's policed tho
The question is, who defines hate speech and how does one regulate that?