What I was thinking is that the president is a honorific leader while the parliament has the real power.

The parliament, which is composed of workers. But! Here’s the big twist! What if we had *gasp* political pluralism?

Explain 😗

So basically, while the official status quo would be socialist, opposition wouldn’t really be silenced. Because we need opposition to know what mistakes we do and to improve ourselves. If the opposition wins, then they can implement their own policies and can deviate from socialism. Again, the president doesn’t have any real power over the parliament, so they can peacefully transition towards whatever else, if that’s what the people chose.

That’s a dream because a socialist party wouldn’t win democratically due to many reasons <:KEK:726877368601411624>

Isn't that what the royal family kind of was?

Ah that sounds kinda cool. 😎 Except that the leader is not a king/queen, they’re a president.

Like a figure head but without actual power

Idk sounds useless

A parliamentary republic

Like most of Europe?

That is pretty much what the UK is.

Ah, that’s cool. 😎

Monarcho-socialism actually exists <:KEK:726877368601411624>

except national identity isn't really a thing in the uk

Yes... unfortunately...

They let the radical Muslims enter the country...

i swear most people including me thinks that the monarchy is stupid

well i don't have a opinion on that

oh what about radical muslims

You know, the terrorists and the rapists who are Muslim?

i actually can't have a opinion on that it's a criminal offense technically

hate speech or whatever... i don't know how much it's policed tho

The question is, who defines hate speech and how does one regulate that?

honestly idk. don't think it's policed much

but denying freedom of speech is denying a answer for you to find truth in something

even if it is really bad. if you can't discuss it then that's kind of stupid

Honestly I think hate speech laws are stupid

But I've never experienced any

The PC religion obviously defines what hate speech is 🤣

>_< yeah they can change the rules any day

Like Merriam webster changes their definitions every other day

my thoughts on hate speech, is it should not be regualted but condemned, it shouldn't take a genius to refrain from saying certain things that make you sound like an insensitive prick and or a douche.

I have redone my political compass and I’m now a moderate libertarian leftist

Once you control the language, you can control the narrative, therefore controlling info, and controlling the people

Wow.

It cannot be legally defined, because it is subjective in it's very nature. Lefties throw it around to try to add weight to their screeching

Literally 1984

Mhm exactly

Political correctness is Newspeak

It's happening already