read access to what for example

Say there is a crime committed. Say local law enforcement come to believe person A may under suspicion, law enforcement would have complete read access to your accounts information,

No, they have a warrant

no

thats like the same thing with government

But would be required to enter a valid warrant id to attempt to access

we dont want them accessing our info

I know

i would say maybe with a valid warrant

But after entering the warrant for the information notify the user of the access atempt?

Criminals should be punished, if they believe the info is available and they get a warrant to access that info, they should get access to the info

Should you also be notified your information has been accessed? And remind the users its a public platform?

And here's the warrant, we fully recommend you contact a lawyer?

No, that would alert them and possibly allow them to destroy possible evidence

Too late

Cloud storage

For information

We would be talking very large servers needed to host the scalability required

What if some information is online and some is in person? Police wouldn’t access both at once and as soon as criminals gets that notification they would destroy evidence and might even attempt to flee the country

Anything shared to the service would have been sent to the media cloud storagr

Ok, and?

Once the warrant had been issued the account would have an image captured of it

All information that was there given to authorities

That wouldn’t stop a criminal from buy plane tickets to Cuba after flushing all their coke down the toilet

The notification would allow the criminals to destroy physical evidence not online yet

Exceptions then?

Depending on what the warrant type is?

Submit the warrant you need to search physical property to stop the notification?

Most warrants work based off of surprising criminals. If police know he was in contact with know drug dealers and that was online, it’ll be great if they could access it. If when accessing it, they only found he contacted one known drug dealer and didn’t talk too specifically, the criminals would get the warrant notification and destroy all physical evidence.

No, sometimes different warrants for different purposes are issued hours, or weeks apart

Court could issue the physical warrant minutes after the virtual one and it’s be too late

Warrants are legal orders correct?

Yes

And?

How hard would it be to simply require the warrant have a section that states access rights to include for the user to not be notified?

I can almost guarantee you that wanting to give people a simple notification on one social media platform will not change the law

Thats why I'm discussing the ethics of it

Not plausibility

There no real reason to give a notification anyway, if it ain’t broke, don’t create a problem for no reason that completely changes the law, it’s functionality, and how it’s conducted

What about real time gps tracking of phones that request 911 assistance?

Thinking more about the should it be done if possible?