Message from @βπ§βο½απ πΏπ―
Discord ID: 767565020405039135
nice
Indeed
Then you can go be depressed in a box
Would anyone be down for an ethics discussion over a scenario?
sure why not
Maybe on like 15 minutes
Suppose you were to build a competing social media platform. But you wanted to do a little extra
Allow users with verified accounts access to overrides in case of fires, or the need for medial or law enforcement aid by a person?
Would allowing those same law enforcement officials have complete read access in instance of a valid warrant id's be ethical?
read access to what for example
Say there is a crime committed. Say local law enforcement come to believe person A may under suspicion, law enforcement would have complete read access to your accounts information,
No, they have a warrant
no
thats like the same thing with government
But would be required to enter a valid warrant id to attempt to access
we dont want them accessing our info
I know
i would say maybe with a valid warrant
But after entering the warrant for the information notify the user of the access atempt?
Criminals should be punished, if they believe the info is available and they get a warrant to access that info, they should get access to the info
Should you also be notified your information has been accessed? And remind the users its a public platform?
And here's the warrant, we fully recommend you contact a lawyer?
No, that would alert them and possibly allow them to destroy possible evidence
Too late
Cloud storage
For information
We would be talking very large servers needed to host the scalability required
What if some information is online and some is in person? Police wouldnβt access both at once and as soon as criminals gets that notification they would destroy evidence and might even attempt to flee the country
Anything shared to the service would have been sent to the media cloud storagr
Ok, and?
Once the warrant had been issued the account would have an image captured of it
All information that was there given to authorities
That wouldnβt stop a criminal from buy plane tickets to Cuba after flushing all their coke down the toilet
The notification would allow the criminals to destroy physical evidence not online yet
Exceptions then?
Depending on what the warrant type is?
Submit the warrant you need to search physical property to stop the notification?
Most warrants work based off of surprising criminals. If police know he was in contact with know drug dealers and that was online, itβll be great if they could access it. If when accessing it, they only found he contacted one known drug dealer and didnβt talk too specifically, the criminals would get the warrant notification and destroy all physical evidence.
No, sometimes different warrants for different purposes are issued hours, or weeks apart
Court could issue the physical warrant minutes after the virtual one and itβs be too late
Warrants are legal orders correct?