1. Lower standard of living 2. Less wealth 3. Dramitically more rape victims 4. Shamed for not adhering to social norms such as staying home and cooking/cleaning. There have been many tests conducted concluding that in the workplace women are not as respected as men and are not given as many oportunities to suceed. That is in the U.S alone but there are many more problems with the underlying social constructs that result in men being given a better chance to succeed over women

On standards of living and wealth, this is an complex set of data and often does not compare apples to apples. What occupations on average? Single/Married/Children. When you do compare those you see a very narrow band and in some cases females make more than their male counterparts. I'd argue in *this* category in particular females are not arbitrarily disadvantaged. If we take say the "single mother" aspect, than you would say "People with dependents are disadvantaged" but that could include single fathers even if that involves "less" individuals. Regarding rape the statistics show children actually are the highest risk group for sexual assault comprising almost 70% of all incidents, but I will fully yield that yes adult women are at higher risk than the average adult man but the incidents of rape vary almost as much by other factors such as location or education level. In terms of societal shame.. we can't really quantify such a subjective concept but I would not consider *that* a prevailing thought

But again it circles back to my point of like, IMO you disadvantage males that are at risk by over generalizing. I know it's human nature to simplify it's an easier message to convey but it's not the right message IMO

Joe these statistics are averages and aren’t looked at in specificity but I understand thst

To me it's like saying "Rich people have less problems" versus "Poor people have problems". Is it the same message? Really. Or is one actually trying to "Tear down rich people" versus actually helping poor people.

--

Way to kill chat @Dark . I know I know

LOL

I was gonna say, I'll come back when you guys are stupider.

I really thought @Draconem_Dominus would show up and rail on about something

But he did not lol and Gen 1 is crazy lol

Say what you want. Bur women aren’t sent to die if war breaks out

Men are more likely to commit suicide

That's common sense. You don't kill your breeders.

Yeah I mean each side has it's bullet points I just like to call out the 'irony' for lack of a better term perhaps about the messaging it's clearly "sensationalism"

Ye I can see that. Makes more sense now.

🙋🏾‍♀️
🕳

I swear, Zed, that makes me think of something naughty every time.

oh yikes my body 💀

Of what, Ronin?

-.. --- ... . / - .... . / . -. --. .-.. .. ... .... / --- -. .-.. -.-- / .-. ..- .-.. . / -. .--. .--. .-.. -.-- / - --- / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- ..- . ..--..

It’s just a hole 🕳

Ahhh morse cose

It looks like a long thing with two ends.

Shit. I used to know that.

lol

🔨?

Ahh this stupid reply button being merged with the quote button. I find it annoying. -_-

Like this?

No. More when I’m looking for the wrong thing.

I can't get more specific because rules.

Ohhh

A steel beam perhaps.

Just talk about it like fast food

And I swear, if my ISP keeps dropping, I'm gonna find the main tech with a hammer.

It’s long and has two ends ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Well, let's see, Dark...You know that burger that two women can eat from either side?

Yeah

Looks like one of those.

Ahh

Only apply Rule #6 to that.