yeah. it's on the news

Just watched a video on gun control

It said why are there no grenade killings

Like this is why they don’t you grenades

The RV Bomb in Tennessee?

Yeah

🥰 hi🥰

*spreads more heart*

yes ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ 🥰

@djream Do you know the case of Timothy Joseph Boomer vs. The State of Michigan?

I do not

and I'm a Michiganite. I'm about to get schooled, ain't I? 😜

So for the Background, there was a law written in the state of Michigan where you can be arrested for Swearing, or using profanity infront of Women and children.

Joseph Boomer was arrested as he cursed from falling into the water while kayaking with a party nearby

and in my home town, still on the books, a woman for wearing a skirt that's higher than her ankle

He was arrested instantly

Now what seems wrong with this?

You must grant me that I believe that we need a new revolution to negate most off the laws that has been signed in since the original signing. Our original Constitution was what, 10 pages? Now the laws that govern our lands about is in the millions. It's much too complicated

The law you refer to seems to be in conflict with our First Amendment, and thus, null and void

Well, actually it was appealed based on the 14th Amendement. But let's bring this back to the moral side of the Argument.

Morally, you would agree that swearing in general is bad thing to do correct?

Morally, yes, it's not a good thing. But, it is protected by the 1st

We can agree that morally it is wrong. Now let me bring you to another case.

go on

Snyder V. Phelps

Heard of that one?

not that I am aware of, no

This one is a more extreme case of the 1st Amendment.

Basically, back in the Iraq war, a family held a funeral for a fallen son of theirs.

But outside there was a protest.

my interest is piqued

"God Hates the USA/Thank God for 9/11," This is a quote of a sign

"Thank God for Dead Soldiers,"

And another

Now I think we both can agree this is outrageous.

again, protected by the first amendment, and coincided with my sediments with me at the time of my youthful ignorance

Yes! so legally speaking it is protected by law.

But Morally, it is terrible

the USA MIL has overreached it's boundies for decades before that. Was it morally right in the short term, no. In the long term, we have still yet to see

I do not disagree with you

But these are cases of Morality in Law where we should remain impartial on Morality.

Now don't get me wrong. There are laws that do use morals.