Message from @Whitepilled_Templar
Discord ID: 729588262288621629
Gah.
lol
Nah
<:Idiots:720119404020367390>
In regards to Wikipedia and flat-earthers:
Yes
Also 80% of Wikipedia pages that you can 'reliably' quote are stubs and do not contain a verifiable signature as a reference from actors involved, usually just Journalism. Journalism is never a good source, and is always over-ostentatious TO AN EXTENT. Even the best journalism has the same flaws as any other secondary source.
*bush committed Titanic, icebergs can’t melt steel hauls*
wait. They actually do quote wikipedia? lol
Arguing with them is like arguing with a commie
It's not a reasonable belief
lol
never heard of it
neither have I
conservapedia makes a good read though
that means it's probably good
The truth is for those who seek it
doies SPLC say they're a hate group? if so, 99% chance they're not
okay, on a SERIOUS note
"Metapedia is an online wiki-based encyclopedia which contains authoritarian far-right, white nationalist, white supremacist, anti-feminist, homophobic, Islamophobic, antisemitic, Holocaust-denying, and neo-Nazi points of view. The site describes itself as focusing on European culture, art, science, philosophy, and politics." geez lol
The problem with wikipedia is that a writer can fuck around with the letters that the original actor intended to reach an audience with. Wikipedia should have a checkmark announcing the Author wrote the article.
I'm trying to find someone who installed Scotchshield auto glass tint
it resists rioters trying to break in
who installs I mean
whoever described that site used all of the sjw accusations lol
ah yeah, wikipedia, tha'ts right
lol
use duckduckgo
I did a quick google search?
it's my default
I only use duck duck go when researching
Otherwise I use google.
I switch to google only when duckduck fails or when I'm shopping something that ddg can't parse
Lol just read some metapedia stuff, seems really edgy
ahahahahah
I love Wiki's description
I wonder if it actuallyt means anything at all
I like the little “did you know...” facts on the side
> metapedia's wikipedia article versus wikipedia's metapedia article
@Deleted User As I read that I imagined two kids flaming at eachother on a keyboard xD.
They are all just random things I did not ask nor really need to know lol
i was just comparing the homosexuality articles of the 2 because that was one of the accusations wiki had against meta