neither have I

conservapedia makes a good read though

that means it's probably good

The truth is for those who seek it

doies SPLC say they're a hate group? if so, 99% chance they're not

okay, on a SERIOUS note

"Metapedia is an online wiki-based encyclopedia which contains authoritarian far-right, white nationalist, white supremacist, anti-feminist, homophobic, Islamophobic, antisemitic, Holocaust-denying, and neo-Nazi points of view. The site describes itself as focusing on European culture, art, science, philosophy, and politics." geez lol

The problem with wikipedia is that a writer can fuck around with the letters that the original actor intended to reach an audience with. Wikipedia should have a checkmark announcing the Author wrote the article.

I'm trying to find someone who installed Scotchshield auto glass tint

it resists rioters trying to break in

who installs I mean

whoever described that site used all of the sjw accusations lol

ah yeah, wikipedia, tha'ts right

lol

use duckduckgo

I did a quick google search?

it's my default

I only use duck duck go when researching

Otherwise I use google.

I switch to google only when duckduck fails or when I'm shopping something that ddg can't parse

Lol just read some metapedia stuff, seems really edgy

ahahahahah

I love Wiki's description

I wonder if it actuallyt means anything at all

I like the little “did you know...” facts on the side

> metapedia's wikipedia article versus wikipedia's metapedia article
@Deleted User As I read that I imagined two kids flaming at eachother on a keyboard xD.

They are all just random things I did not ask nor really need to know lol

i was just comparing the homosexuality articles of the 2 because that was one of the accusations wiki had against meta

"homophobe"

lol

meta seems to be way more accurate when it comes to health issues where wiki is just kinda pandering

i got horny pride ...i'm proudful that i'm a horny bastard

I think both could be more objective 👿

The white proud one is a fallacy.

Actually it'sm pretty correct on homosexuality

except that we have definitive evidence that it is not hardwired

> Actually it'sm pretty correct on homosexuality
@Sugar Goat which one?

because it does not exist at all in many societies

i think meta is

the one called Homosexuality

right the meta one