Message from @Whitepilled_Templar
Discord ID: 729587594551099402
it made me feel nauseous
Fucka you cow, and fucka you chicken! @DemonCBR
I only eat live food
DONT LOOK THAT UP
if you don't know what it is
Quit spamming propaganda here
who? lol
i was wondering that too
Guess you both should stop then if you're wondering who
<:emoji_10:723010351150661655>
What?
Huh?
What is propaganda?
Who?
Gah.
lol
Nah
<:Idiots:720119404020367390>
In regards to Wikipedia and flat-earthers:
Yes
Also 80% of Wikipedia pages that you can 'reliably' quote are stubs and do not contain a verifiable signature as a reference from actors involved, usually just Journalism. Journalism is never a good source, and is always over-ostentatious TO AN EXTENT. Even the best journalism has the same flaws as any other secondary source.
*bush committed Titanic, icebergs can’t melt steel hauls*
wait. They actually do quote wikipedia? lol
Arguing with them is like arguing with a commie
It's not a reasonable belief
lol
never heard of it
neither have I
conservapedia makes a good read though
that means it's probably good
The truth is for those who seek it
doies SPLC say they're a hate group? if so, 99% chance they're not
okay, on a SERIOUS note
"Metapedia is an online wiki-based encyclopedia which contains authoritarian far-right, white nationalist, white supremacist, anti-feminist, homophobic, Islamophobic, antisemitic, Holocaust-denying, and neo-Nazi points of view. The site describes itself as focusing on European culture, art, science, philosophy, and politics." geez lol
The problem with wikipedia is that a writer can fuck around with the letters that the original actor intended to reach an audience with. Wikipedia should have a checkmark announcing the Author wrote the article.
I'm trying to find someone who installed Scotchshield auto glass tint
it resists rioters trying to break in
who installs I mean
whoever described that site used all of the sjw accusations lol
ah yeah, wikipedia, tha'ts right
lol