Message from @Dinglesplat
Discord ID: 768235422336679956
are you isolationist
Nuclear is more sustainable and cost effective. wi
yes
i am isolationist
do u think demographics are destiny
There have been so many proposed “end of the world” years that it’s practically become a joke
or that people can change
destiny
theres literally no way you haven't heard of nf
@A Person if we manage to create fusion it’s gonna be the best way to solve it
The world ends in 69420.
Oh snap
Do you think if america had a stronger national identity and culture your opinion on whether people could change would be different
also hydro and geo are epic
Also you can’t just build a billion dams because you don’t have enough flowing water
that those who come to america would need to show their allegiance with american values
I know
Though geo seems promising
iceland is awesome they're like 80% geo
But it does seem very dangerous
nope
very safe
I'll send screenies in general2
Nuclear is le way to go.
Alrighty
But underwater turbines in oceans have the same problem as wind
It just won’t cover it
I feel like we’re doing pretty good
Also some dude I talked to said that by 2100 10% of us would be dead
Climate change isn’t that fast holy shit
10%of us would be alive*
Sort of on topic:
"Grrr, America having low carbon emissions doesnt mean anything!!! That just because all our industry is in China!"
"So outsourcing is causing more pollution?"
"Yeah?"
"So protectionism is environmentally friendly?"
*Windows Vista shut down sound*
Pretty sure America has industry regulations in place that would make our factories clean, so if we were to reclaim all our factories we'd barely see a difference, unlike China
<:KEK:726877368601411624>
I bet you atleast half of human climate change is just China
Dang
I just finally saw Kim Klacik's video
*You go, girl*
But I do think renewable energy alone won’t generate enough for everything but we could use it to stay relatively safe untill we reach a breakthrough