Message from @( ಠ ͜ʖರೃ)

Discord ID: 776656577385988138


2020-11-13 03:53:16 UTC  

RIP, I just got kicked out of school for having contact with someone who got Covid

2020-11-13 03:53:53 UTC  

Hi

2020-11-13 03:54:17 UTC  

Hi

2020-11-13 03:54:22 UTC  

all my friends schools are online

2020-11-13 03:54:37 UTC  

Alex is a furry? Hwat I didn't expect that

2020-11-13 03:54:37 UTC  

phenotypes aren't what determines sex

2020-11-13 03:54:40 UTC  

Eh. I got an account on furaffinity. Got several little characters o mine.

2020-11-13 03:54:48 UTC  

that would be the sex chromosomes

2020-11-13 03:54:48 UTC  

can someone explain why taxing the top 1% of people in America to a much higher degree is bad

2020-11-13 03:55:00 UTC  

> phenotypes aren't what determines sex
@-Fiji- Isn't it chromosomal genotypes?

2020-11-13 03:55:10 UTC  

> Alex is a furry? Hwat I didn't expect that
@Book XD

2020-11-13 03:55:23 UTC  

> can someone explain why taxing the top 1% of people in America to a much higher degree is bad
@5pq
Taxation is theft

2020-11-13 03:55:26 UTC  

> @-Fiji- Isn't it chromosomal genotypes?
@( ಠ ͜ʖರೃ) yeah or in other words sex chromosomes

2020-11-13 03:55:28 UTC  

Theft against anyone is wrong

2020-11-13 03:55:36 UTC  

Also because the rich never actually pay that amount anyways.

2020-11-13 03:55:37 UTC  

L> can someone explain why taxing the top 1% of people in America to a much higher degree is bad
@5pq cause once you tax them into poorness you go to the middle class and then the poor

2020-11-13 03:55:39 UTC  

Hello

2020-11-13 03:55:44 UTC  

It can make wages drop, some rich people will move states ( or countries ) to avoid tax

2020-11-13 03:55:47 UTC  

phenotypes are the physical representation of your genetics

2020-11-13 03:55:50 UTC  

but ur taxing only the top 1% right

2020-11-13 03:55:57 UTC  

> phenotypes are the physical representation of your genetics
@-Fiji- Yes

2020-11-13 03:55:59 UTC  

so they couldn't possibly be taxed into the middle class

2020-11-13 03:56:05 UTC  

> but ur taxing only the top 1% right
@5pq yes but their money isn’t unlimited

2020-11-13 03:56:07 UTC  

sorry I'm taking a biology class lol

2020-11-13 03:56:09 UTC  

true

2020-11-13 03:56:10 UTC  

The 1% won't stay to be taxed. They'll leave. Move money offshore etc

2020-11-13 03:56:12 UTC  

> so they couldn't possibly be taxed into the middle class
@5pq They could be taxed pretty close

2020-11-13 03:56:18 UTC  

Yes but taxing them will make them not want to work as hard if they know their hard work will be taken away

2020-11-13 03:56:21 UTC  

The top 1% always find some loopholes anyways lol.

2020-11-13 03:56:24 UTC  

> sorry I'm taking a biology class lol
@-Fiji- Same

2020-11-13 03:56:30 UTC  

"why you be trippin mom?"

2020-11-13 03:56:34 UTC  

yeah the Beatles came to America to avoid taxes

2020-11-13 03:56:34 UTC  

Why would we tax the rich any more than the rest of us? Arent we taxed on a fixed percentage depending on where we work?

2020-11-13 03:56:37 UTC  

> @-Fiji- Same
@( ಠ ͜ʖರೃ) whate grade r u in?

2020-11-13 03:56:37 UTC  

> "why you be trippin mom?"
@xd_gangster69 had some mushrooms

2020-11-13 03:56:49 UTC  

Raising the taxes on the top 1%, the ultra-wealthy is easily a problem, because if they don't like the taxes, they'll just up and move and you'll get nothing. <:thinking:726878987837636698>

2020-11-13 03:56:49 UTC  

yum

2020-11-13 03:56:54 UTC  

so the argument is that taxing them to a much higher degree will just put them lower in terms of socioeconomic status which is jsut closer to socialism?

2020-11-13 03:56:56 UTC  

just

2020-11-13 03:56:56 UTC  

> @( ಠ ͜ʖರೃ) whate grade r u in?
@-Fiji- I'm a Junior in High School, what about you?

2020-11-13 03:57:05 UTC  

So, one Furry asking another Furry what their phenotype is equates to asking, "What does your Furry self look like'?