Message from @[daddy]Adika
Discord ID: 780089599858573313
Yea it is sometimes a bit better but not significantly
If we could generate the energy by nuclear power
And, unlike a gas car, in 10 years it wont have created less emissions then getting a new car, cause itll need another battery pack
@Phantom _Energy Electric cars get energy from coal and are made at factories that produce emissions that use minerals that you have to mine.
Personally, I believe the future lies in biodiesel
it would be a different situation
Me too
It's not perfect
but the best we've got
@Smitty I think they have the potential too reduce emissions, but I think the real benefit is that no matter where you are (as long as you are prepared) there are always ways of generating electron flow; however, finding gasoline in the middle of nowhere is hard.
Well, the worst part is, nuclear is very unstable in an automobile application
Electricity lines
shoukd be renewed
So its either use the same batterys and use electricity generated by nuclear, or have a reactor in car
The latter isnt safe at all
short term high cost but otherwise we won't have cars even in 40 years
@Phantom _Energy Yeah, but they reduce emission so little that there is barely any difference.
No there shozldn't be a reactor inside the car
@Smitty I agree
The reason I say biodiesel is because we already have alot of vehicles running diesel, and biodiesel is completely sustainable
@Smitty I just think they are more versatile in how they can be powered.
If we could use the energy of nuclear reactors togenerate hydrogen from water , then we could use hydrogen as a fuel
@[daddy]Adika He wasn't saying that. He was trying to say that the electricity would be powered by nuclear
I see
Awe dang. No fallout cars 😦
You might not be able to put a nuclear reactor in a car, but you can use the electricity generated from a nuclear power plant to power an electric car.
Yes, but then you still have the battery issue
Ye. I always say nuclear power is the future. But people too scared of it. Cause Chernobyl and whatnot.
Lithium batteries are awful for the environment to produce, and they don't last
Or use Nikola Tesla's idea of distributing power wirelessly using tesla coils.
@DJ Sullivan J.D Well, Chernobyl was created because they didn't have enough security, and the workers weren't properly trained.
Eh, then all the rural areas get fukt
Shitty communist reactor and whatnot. But is very big news. People might be scared cause they read about it. The technology has improved since then and our people are actually trained unlike the communists. So I don’t see the reason for fearing nuclear power, other than the potential damage it might cause. -_-
Thats why people are scared of nuclear. Wide range effects if failure.
@DJ Sullivan J.D Yeah, true. We also have walls around our power plants to prevent nuclear waste from spilling out just in case something bad happened.
Nuclear power plants are relatively ancient tech created on analog systems, its really incredible how smart people *used* to be
yes but with the new technology that we have, nuclear energy may not only be the best way to have energy, but also the best for the environment as long as they keep it up to code and secure
But computers have made people pretty simple and stupid