Message from @[daddy]Adika

Discord ID: 780089360031678504


2020-11-22 15:13:39 UTC  

@AJ The purpose of electric is to reduce emissions, but they don't even do that really so they are kinda pointless.

2020-11-22 15:13:48 UTC  

Electric cars are only great in the countries that do produce their energy in a carbon negative manner

2020-11-22 15:13:56 UTC  

like sweden

2020-11-22 15:14:01 UTC  

def. not the US

2020-11-22 15:14:33 UTC  

Nuclear is the way to go imo

2020-11-22 15:14:33 UTC  

Even then, the cars themselves being created is bad for the environment

2020-11-22 15:14:41 UTC  

Lithium batteries are hell to produce

2020-11-22 15:14:56 UTC  

Yea it is sometimes a bit better but not significantly

2020-11-22 15:15:15 UTC  

If we could generate the energy by nuclear power

2020-11-22 15:15:17 UTC  

And, unlike a gas car, in 10 years it wont have created less emissions then getting a new car, cause itll need another battery pack

2020-11-22 15:15:24 UTC  

@Phantom _Energy Electric cars get energy from coal and are made at factories that produce emissions that use minerals that you have to mine.

2020-11-22 15:15:29 UTC  

Personally, I believe the future lies in biodiesel

2020-11-22 15:15:33 UTC  

it would be a different situation

2020-11-22 15:15:54 UTC  

@AJ I think it lies in nuclear power

2020-11-22 15:16:01 UTC  

Me too

2020-11-22 15:16:07 UTC  

It's not perfect

2020-11-22 15:16:13 UTC  

but the best we've got

2020-11-22 15:16:15 UTC  

@Smitty I think they have the potential too reduce emissions, but I think the real benefit is that no matter where you are (as long as you are prepared) there are always ways of generating electron flow; however, finding gasoline in the middle of nowhere is hard.

2020-11-22 15:16:16 UTC  

Well, the worst part is, nuclear is very unstable in an automobile application

2020-11-22 15:16:32 UTC  

Electricity lines

2020-11-22 15:16:36 UTC  

shoukd be renewed

2020-11-22 15:16:46 UTC  

So its either use the same batterys and use electricity generated by nuclear, or have a reactor in car

2020-11-22 15:16:51 UTC  

The latter isnt safe at all

2020-11-22 15:16:56 UTC  

short term high cost but otherwise we won't have cars even in 40 years

2020-11-22 15:17:07 UTC  

@Phantom _Energy Yeah, but they reduce emission so little that there is barely any difference.

2020-11-22 15:17:18 UTC  

No there shozldn't be a reactor inside the car

2020-11-22 15:17:23 UTC  

@Smitty I agree

2020-11-22 15:17:33 UTC  

It's not possible to build such a small reactor anyways

2020-11-22 15:17:37 UTC  

The reason I say biodiesel is because we already have alot of vehicles running diesel, and biodiesel is completely sustainable

2020-11-22 15:17:59 UTC  

@Smitty I just think they are more versatile in how they can be powered.

2020-11-22 15:18:13 UTC  

If we could use the energy of nuclear reactors togenerate hydrogen from water , then we could use hydrogen as a fuel

2020-11-22 15:18:19 UTC  

@[daddy]Adika He wasn't saying that. He was trying to say that the electricity would be powered by nuclear

2020-11-22 15:18:27 UTC  

I see

2020-11-22 15:19:02 UTC  

Awe dang. No fallout cars 😦

2020-11-22 15:19:04 UTC  

You might not be able to put a nuclear reactor in a car, but you can use the electricity generated from a nuclear power plant to power an electric car.

2020-11-22 15:19:43 UTC  

Yes, but then you still have the battery issue

2020-11-22 15:19:44 UTC  

Ye. I always say nuclear power is the future. But people too scared of it. Cause Chernobyl and whatnot.

2020-11-22 15:20:00 UTC  

Lithium batteries are awful for the environment to produce, and they don't last

2020-11-22 15:20:38 UTC  

Or use Nikola Tesla's idea of distributing power wirelessly using tesla coils.

2020-11-22 15:21:19 UTC  

@DJ Sullivan J.D Well, Chernobyl was created because they didn't have enough security, and the workers weren't properly trained.

2020-11-22 15:21:20 UTC  

Eh, then all the rural areas get fukt