Message from @hbutzer0511
Discord ID: 522182672680747020
it happened
according to who lmao
it wasn't invalid for any of the European powers
it stood as the law for over 300 years
now it's invalid?
It was done to end endless wars in Europe not to dethrone the rightfully monarch.
He wasn't dethroned
he was King of Spain
Yeah they are all dethroned now
>arguing about European rule instead of discussing about how we fix our own countries issues. <:really:453005408064241674>
okay?
and?
yeah they are
doesn't change the laws
Which wasnt the original intent.
doesn't matter what intent was LOL
They are all pretenders.
he renounced ALL legal claims to the FRENCH throne by himself and his heirs to the end of time
that was agreed upon and signed into law by all European powers
therefore it stands as law
The revolution ended any rightfully claim to the throne due to the end of continuity of it.
Every unelected ruler is a "pretender", heck even the elected ones pretend to care about the plebs...
LOL
revolution is valid now?
but legal treaty isn't?
No its not valid
Revolution worked out well for us.
okay bud
the dude is of the same line that renounced all claims by legal treaty
he can claim it all he wants
but it is not a legal claim anymore
I have just as good claim as he does
We iz kang? 🤔
objectively you don't have as good a claim as he does
There is no legal claim to the throne it doesnt exist. If he was installed as a monarch it woundnt be invalid either though.
You would have a better argument if the French Monarchy was still a thing
yeah he renounced it (legally, with due process), but he's actually french and of the line. none of us are
thats way different than the argument you were making earlier
@Sam Southern - TN by renouncing legal claim it doesn't matter how close by blood he is he has no legal claim
He has more of right to the throne because of his noble birth