give me a break. what context

the context was he believed there were huge numbers and listed various ones

and he wanted at least that many

Litigation and settlement.

no, it was the context that he needs 11k votes.

Brad R might have not wanted to give an inch because he was under so much criticism

And I just went through the 1 hour call again, there were numerous times everyone said litigation, lawsuit, and settlement.

Yes @Michael S he has no access to the data. He is just going off of non finalized data and speculation. This is not evidence

Sanctions... I really think in no way he meant cook up some 11k votes for me..

It can be dressed any way they like, and Rob can analyse it anyway he likes....the fact is, he said what he said

And Rob is correct in this case.

Sounds like we're putting lipstick on the pig.... but ... no... just badly chosen words not meant to be leaked

Nothing is meant to be leaked

But im glad when things are

Rob is extremely biased. maybe difficult to prosecute, perhaps. But we all heard what was said. Just because it's trump "it's ok"

well all politicians should be aware everythign they say can be put up in public scrutity and there is some good in that

i don't understand, how Rob managed to turn it around and start analyzing that Brad R wasn't answering the questions.

Why is Brad R so reluctant to allow forensic audits

it's all been done.

Ah yes, me, the ardent Trump supporter, is super biased. Right. Rob is correct, Rob's analysis in this instance isn't very biased in my opinion. Nothing will happen, this is another nothingburger from the left. Period.

Enjoy.

to me he is playing defense too too much and not actually investigating

Anywho, bed time! Goodnight!

Night maw!

There is nothing to investigate @Michael S

It’s all speculation

Oh puleeeese

Every accusation trump made was refuted @Michael S

Unlimited forensic audits with no evidence no wrongdoing opens a dangerous can of worms especially for Trumps nutty legal teams fake experts

Why was meaningful observation so adversarial

Believing and hoping there was fraud doesn’t mean there was

to me that's a huge red flag

why re you eluding to you being a trump supporter? & Rob is biased, he said as much himself. i'm not saying anything will happen, Trump is protect anyway. i'm saying i know what i heard on the tape. it can be sugar coated anyway, it won't change the audio.

(Because I'm clearly not)

goodnight.

Nini!

@Michael S there was no hindrance to meaningful observation. That’s another fabrication

i never said that though, not today anyway lol gn

no hinderance... well in some states there was 200ft

and applause when people were kicked out and had ot stare though windows not allowed in

(And I agree with Robert's take despite not being of the same bias.)