Message from @Michael S

Discord ID: 795900931035496488


2021-01-05 06:22:42 UTC  

That’s false @Michael S

2021-01-05 06:22:53 UTC  

the claim is made

2021-01-05 06:23:21 UTC  

A claim is not evidence

2021-01-05 06:23:24 UTC  

if it's an original claim, it's false or bs and already dealt with.

2021-01-05 06:23:40 UTC  

are you assuming that?

2021-01-05 06:23:58 UTC  

you sound dismissive

2021-01-05 06:24:05 UTC  

Are you assuming the claim is true @Michael S

2021-01-05 06:24:18 UTC  

no, i've seen all the claims. i thought you meant something new @Michael S

2021-01-05 06:24:25 UTC  

Without proper evidence, you may dismiss a claim that is baseless.

2021-01-05 06:24:28 UTC  

well in GA Brad R tolf Trump only 2 dead people voted...

2021-01-05 06:24:30 UTC  

This is how evidence works.

2021-01-05 06:24:35 UTC  

This is how the burden of proof works.

2021-01-05 06:24:49 UTC  

and that sounds implausible on the face of it

2021-01-05 06:24:49 UTC  

@Michael S, you just advanced to level 3!

2021-01-05 06:24:57 UTC  

It's not up to other people to prove someone said something is false.

2021-01-05 06:24:57 UTC  

hurray level 3

2021-01-05 06:25:05 UTC  

and Trump told him to find 11k+ votes.

2021-01-05 06:25:20 UTC  

yes.... badly chosen words... but out of context

2021-01-05 06:25:34 UTC  

Trump shoots himself in the foot the way he says things

2021-01-05 06:25:45 UTC  

give me a break. what context

2021-01-05 06:26:09 UTC  

the context was he believed there were huge numbers and listed various ones

2021-01-05 06:26:19 UTC  

and he wanted at least that many

2021-01-05 06:26:32 UTC  

Litigation and settlement.

2021-01-05 06:26:49 UTC  

no, it was the context that he needs 11k votes.

2021-01-05 06:26:57 UTC  

Brad R might have not wanted to give an inch because he was under so much criticism

2021-01-05 06:27:03 UTC  

And I just went through the 1 hour call again, there were numerous times everyone said litigation, lawsuit, and settlement.

2021-01-05 06:27:17 UTC  

Yes @Michael S he has no access to the data. He is just going off of non finalized data and speculation. This is not evidence

2021-01-05 06:27:32 UTC  

Sanctions... I really think in no way he meant cook up some 11k votes for me..

2021-01-05 06:27:34 UTC  

It can be dressed any way they like, and Rob can analyse it anyway he likes....the fact is, he said what he said

2021-01-05 06:27:54 UTC  

And Rob is correct in this case.

2021-01-05 06:28:11 UTC  

Sounds like we're putting lipstick on the pig.... but ... no... just badly chosen words not meant to be leaked

2021-01-05 06:28:34 UTC  

Nothing is meant to be leaked

2021-01-05 06:28:48 UTC  

But im glad when things are

2021-01-05 06:29:27 UTC  

Rob is extremely biased. maybe difficult to prosecute, perhaps. But we all heard what was said. Just because it's trump "it's ok"

2021-01-05 06:29:39 UTC  

well all politicians should be aware everythign they say can be put up in public scrutity and there is some good in that

2021-01-05 06:30:16 UTC  

i don't understand, how Rob managed to turn it around and start analyzing that Brad R wasn't answering the questions.

2021-01-05 06:30:17 UTC  

Why is Brad R so reluctant to allow forensic audits

2021-01-05 06:30:27 UTC  

it's all been done.

2021-01-05 06:30:34 UTC  

Ah yes, me, the ardent Trump supporter, is super biased. Right. Rob is correct, Rob's analysis in this instance isn't very biased in my opinion. Nothing will happen, this is another nothingburger from the left. Period.

2021-01-05 06:30:46 UTC  

Enjoy.

2021-01-05 06:30:46 UTC  

to me he is playing defense too too much and not actually investigating