Our brothers are in DC

@deMontfort they got a car mechanic who failed out of military intelligence entry level training courses https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawandcrime.com/2020-election/sydney-powells-military-intelligence-expert-witness-was-actually-an-army-mechanic-who-never-worked-in-military-intelligence-report/amp/

means you're not qualified to be in Trump's inner circle at the moment

@TaLoN132 A question. The call between Trump and Georgia, was that a settlement call?

If you say so... The reality is that "forensic" implies a scientific approach or methodology. None exists or has been established for forensically auditing voting machines. There is no manual. There is no guideline. For proof, look at the ridiculous report that Russ Ramsland's ASOG put together in Antrim Country, MI. (BTW - you should look into who Ramsland is).

A forensic audit/examination is designed to focus on reconstructing past financial transactions for a specific purpose, such as concerns of fraud, whereas an internal audit is typically focused more on compliance and/or the performance of the organization

Tomorrow we take DC

We are talking specifically about the investigation into the ballot machine’s inner workings and function. That is a “forensic” investigation to discover additional technical evidence.

google 30 seconds @TaLoN132

I'm not sure... I heard that Trump's team had made 18 other attempts to get Raffensperger on the line to bypass the courts to gain access to data that they wanted access to. Raffensperger explained why he was prevented from releasing that data, IIRC. So, Trump's team considered it a settlement call in that they were trying to preempt having to go through the courts to attain what they wanted.

?

Thank you. Seems like another spin from the Trump campaign.

No one asked you for your “professional” opinion. They hired someone with *extensive technical experience to conduct that Forensic look at the ballot machines so we don’t need to listen to your magical skills you don’t have.

A forensic audit/examination is designed to focus on reconstructing past financial transactions for a specific purpose, such as concerns of fraud, whereas an internal audit is typically focused more on compliance and/or the performance of the organization

Possibly... It might just be semantics. I think that Raffensperger and Ryan Germany took Trump's threats seriously and decided to preemptively lay their cards on the table.

pretty simple to do here and you don't have to take apart the machines, you count all the votes on all the ballots by hand, that's human eyeballs, two (minimum) per ballot who have to agree on each one before proceeding, and then compare the numbers you get that way with the numbers you get from the machines ... if the numbers come out the same, which they did in GA, then the machines are counting the same as human eyeballs

I like @TaLoN132 ‘s professional opinion. Gives me context and clarity.

Yeah... They hired this guy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCNkGSk6AxM&start=2004%29

Trump also tweeted false information about them.

Trump's threats?? as in his Threat dont break the law???

"Trump: OK, whatever, it's a disaster. It's a disaster."

Thank you.

Blame the orange man for everything

Exactly... Nothing related to elections.

Didn’t Trump dodge the draft @PatriotPlaya

None of this shit would fly for a publicly traded company. A bunch of sworn affidavits from whistleblowers and the SEC and FBI would know what porn the CEO’s son likes to watch.

bone spurs supposedly

How nice if “two eyeballs” were present as 5 suitcases of ballots were illegally pulled out from under a tablecloth after dismissing all ballot watchers and media from the room. Have you wondered why Republicans have stopped listening to your drivel?

Donald trump is a patriot its fake news

It's not just me that heard it as a threat... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR015Wo6zww

Don't get too excited... It sounds better than it is.

So a Wheel is only a wheel if it apply s to a Bike ? is that you best argument??? you have 2 words sir! its not rocket science...

@DangerousFreedom yeah only in this case they took the machines out of the equation and did two full hand recounts. Turned out to be the same as the machines

A SINGLE sworn affidavit is enough to lock a person away for murder. You think 1,000+ bi-partisan affidavits across 6 states wouldn’t lock a CEO up for fraud? That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever herd

No it isn’t. Are you trolling @deMontfort

Any of these “audits” that have been conducted are jokes. Public companies would get disclaimers of opinion

Maybe you should express that opinion to the Lawyers in the group bub.

Are we in disagreement?

Unverifiable affidavits carry no weight @deMontfort