Message from @roddy

Discord ID: 796960753592434689


2021-01-08 04:27:03 UTC  

Listen, we can't fix thing, stuff has been done this way in the past.

2021-01-08 04:27:06 UTC  

I'm talking about in court... our legal system is based on it being adversarial.

2021-01-08 04:27:06 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/796958138208485446/ocasio.jpeg

2021-01-08 04:27:34 UTC  

@TaLoN132 there are no adversaries, the entire system is corrupt to it's core. That's the point.

2021-01-08 04:27:34 UTC  

@Skizerz, you just advanced to level 2!

2021-01-08 04:27:52 UTC  

Whoosh

2021-01-08 04:28:01 UTC  

Do you not understand how easily a computer system can be hacked? Then votes manipulated. In use of Dominion's software, an average operator can change votes, without hacking. Keep in mind that people are flawed, and if so motivated by greed or conviction, they will cheat. There is always someone willing to cheat.

2021-01-08 04:28:59 UTC  

Therefore fraud.

2021-01-08 04:29:43 UTC  

Sure... I have wanted to know the truth of what happened, so I started to think about what it would take to pull off the level of fraud being alleged. It is staggering what it would take. I posted my ideas here, if you are interested: https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/784832307219136612

2021-01-08 04:30:32 UTC  

All I was saying is that someone who purports to be an unbiased independent expert should actually be one.

2021-01-08 04:32:08 UTC  

I think Skizerz point is that it is not possible, we all have implicit bias. You need several teams to get closer to the truth.

2021-01-08 04:32:27 UTC  

He doesnt' have the NSA DOJ FBI etc' thought @TaLoN132

2021-01-08 04:32:38 UTC  

they all hate him

2021-01-08 04:34:57 UTC  

I wonder how many people will drop out of the army and not join under a Biden precedency,

2021-01-08 04:34:57 UTC  

@leftingfighter33, you just advanced to level 17!

2021-01-08 04:34:57 UTC  

> I think Skizerz point is that it is not possible, we all have implicit bias. You need several teams to get closer to the truth.
@LairdZach Do you think no one else thought to look into anything or is it that they are all in on it except this handful of patriots? Or both?

2021-01-08 04:35:12 UTC  

Also, regardless if there was fraud or not... The election rules being changed, accepting ballots based on their postmark date, not requiring signature and sending unsolicited ballots

2021-01-08 04:36:27 UTC  

Who's they and him?

2021-01-08 04:37:10 UTC  

i saw fraud 1st hand in 2016 so it was very ez to follow the claims. After the witnesses got attacked for the message they crumbled to the influence of bad actors.. So yea i may have Bias as a result but to be told over and over again that there is no rational thinking for the facts i saw just pissed everyone off...

2021-01-08 04:37:30 UTC  

I'll look at it in a bit. I have other things I need to do.....

2021-01-08 04:37:40 UTC  

trump, all those alphabet agencies hate him

2021-01-08 04:38:38 UTC  

Have you seen trump's video?
go to his twitter, mute the video, full screen it, go to like 2:10 into the video - then look at his neck and prepare to shit yourself

2021-01-08 04:39:18 UTC  

Yes, yes. The entire world hates Trump and have existed only for the possibility of subverting his presidency. That sounds likely.

2021-01-08 04:40:10 UTC  
2021-01-08 04:40:18 UTC  

I think people are incompetent or willfully ignorant.

2021-01-08 04:40:56 UTC  

Trump needs absolutely no help subverting his presidency. He's doing fine all by himself.

2021-01-08 04:41:18 UTC  

I'm not sure of the dots you are trying to connect... You told us before of witnessing fraud in MI, IIRC. I have always said that fraud should be pursued and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I have never claimed otherwise,.

2021-01-08 04:41:20 UTC  

All of them. Except the handful who are promoting a fraud narrative. Got it. Thanks. @LairdZach

2021-01-08 04:42:27 UTC  

You can literally see the head float separate from the body at 2:10. My eyes then stared intently where the neck and shirt meet....so obvious this is fake! The body is a stand-in, while the head is artificially added on. If Twitter allowed this to be posted, then it for sure isn't good. Think this is just to pacify the masses? What the?

2021-01-08 04:42:50 UTC  

what video are you talking about?

2021-01-08 04:42:51 UTC  

@Kaiser, you just advanced to level 7!

2021-01-08 04:43:26 UTC  

This is the part I like about this kind of thing. Now people learn what terms like 'sedition' and 'insurrection' actually mean, and will maybe stop using them to describe everything they don't like.

2021-01-08 04:44:42 UTC  

For instance:

Donald Trump was seditious when he incited insurrection.

2021-01-08 04:45:11 UTC  

Just an example.

2021-01-08 04:46:18 UTC  

There is a difference between having an implicit bias that would not take precedence over your commitment of professional objectivity and someone who has a vested interest in proving fraud. All you have to do is read the report and see that they reach conclusions without offering any details on the methodology used to reach those conclusions. Here is what I thought of the report at the time that it was released: https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/788504933124276234

2021-01-08 04:48:31 UTC  

What?

2021-01-08 04:49:08 UTC  

This claim of election fraud is disputed, and this Tweet can’t be replied to, Retweeted, or liked due to a risk of violence

2021-01-08 04:49:12 UTC  

This is so crazy

2021-01-08 04:49:15 UTC  

Barry Zulauf, an analytic ombudsman and longtime intelligence official, issued a 14-page report obtained by the Washington Examiner to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, revealing his investigation was “conducted in response to IC complaints regarding the election threat issue." In addition, he lamented the “polarized atmosphere has threatened to undermine the foundations of our Republic, penetrating even into the Intelligence Community.”

“Given analytic differences in the way Russia and China analysts examined their targets, China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence or interference. The analysts appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward because they tend to disagree with the administration’s policies, saying in effect, I don’t want our intelligence used to support those policies,” Zulauf concluded, saying this behavior violated analytic standards requiring independence from political considerations.