Message from @FinnJ
Discord ID: 796081079433297960
He has some interesting takes on 'decadent revolutions,' in particular his view of the french revolution is that it was conservative rather than progressive; and effectively continued the same agenda the monarchy did
Yes
This is a view Zizek speak about
How macrons win over la penne was more conservative than la panne winning
Because the consequence of la penne would rile up the left
*"The revolution had been much more conservative than had been supposed till then. He [Tocqueville] pointed out that most of the characteristic institutions of modern France date from the Old Regime. Centrilization, the issue of regulations on every possible pretext, administrative tutelage of the communes, exemption of civil servants from the jurisdiction of the courts; he found only one important innovation, the coexistence, which was established in the year VIII of the isolated civil servants and deliberate council. The principles of the Old Regime reapeared in 1800, and the old customs were received back into favour.[19]"*
Sorel sources Tocqueville, L'Ancien Regime et la Revolution, Livre ii, chapitress i., iii., pp. 89, 91, 94, 288
And the consequence of macron is the conditions that led to la penne
This is a very Hegelian distinction
Rather than produce a synthesis
We revert back
To the original thesis
I'm planning on reading Hegel at some later date, I know he's insufferable to read.
Marx roasted hegel in one book
Insofar I just use my trusty philosophy tool's book
Let me find it
I was introduced to Master-slave dialectics through cuckphilosophy, and has insofar noted the usage of that 'line of reasoning' in Marx. I think it's a rather interesting method of analyzing social conditions; i.e. by juxtaposing two groups to each other and finding the root cause of their relations, what differentiate them etc.
Also, based department: https://thenextrecession.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/uk-rate-of-profit-august-2015.pdf
Hello
Hey
We will debate if you believe Biden should go to prison
I believe he should
Why’s that
He’s a terrorist
He’s a bad person
He knew about the terrorist attack on the Crimea
You can’t go to prison for being a bad person
You gotta break laws to go to prison...
He talked with poroshenko and knew of his plot of the terrorist attack on the Crimea
He didn’t warn the people
Proof
K
Are there any other sources
Yes
Or just this random YouTube video
Couldn’t you also argue that trump has broken the law?
But he didn’t have knowledge on the inside of a president betraying there own country in a civil war