Message from @eating my bread n having it too
Discord ID: 796067686551519242
As in you make assumptions about others experiences but objection about your own
Okay. I am acquainted, nevermind. Roger Scruton goes through that in Chapter 2 of Sexual desire.
Or chapter 3, as that's where he defines 'persons,' I'm not well read enough on transcendental idealism to make any claims in respect to it.
It’s the reason I’m a Hegelian
I respect marxism
Its why I’m a syndicalist
Georges Sorel is the guy who got my hyped for Marx.
My dad was a trot militant in thatchers britain ffs <:emoji_75:771477695430393916>
Used to black bag people who refused to go on strike
Have you read Sorel, considering you're a self-described syndicalist.
Im terrible at reading
Same.
But im aware of sorel
But he's rather decent.
I learn through debating best
Through objective experience <:emoji_46:767140732917776384>
He has some interesting takes on 'decadent revolutions,' in particular his view of the french revolution is that it was conservative rather than progressive; and effectively continued the same agenda the monarchy did
Yes
This is a view Zizek speak about
How macrons win over la penne was more conservative than la panne winning
*"The revolution had been much more conservative than had been supposed till then. He [Tocqueville] pointed out that most of the characteristic institutions of modern France date from the Old Regime. Centrilization, the issue of regulations on every possible pretext, administrative tutelage of the communes, exemption of civil servants from the jurisdiction of the courts; he found only one important innovation, the coexistence, which was established in the year VIII of the isolated civil servants and deliberate council. The principles of the Old Regime reapeared in 1800, and the old customs were received back into favour.[19]"*
Sorel sources Tocqueville, L'Ancien Regime et la Revolution, Livre ii, chapitress i., iii., pp. 89, 91, 94, 288
And the consequence of macron is the conditions that led to la penne
This is a very Hegelian distinction
Rather than produce a synthesis
We revert back
To the original thesis
I'm planning on reading Hegel at some later date, I know he's insufferable to read.
Marx roasted hegel in one book
Insofar I just use my trusty philosophy tool's book
Let me find it
I was introduced to Master-slave dialectics through cuckphilosophy, and has insofar noted the usage of that 'line of reasoning' in Marx. I think it's a rather interesting method of analyzing social conditions; i.e. by juxtaposing two groups to each other and finding the root cause of their relations, what differentiate them etc.
Also, based department: https://thenextrecession.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/uk-rate-of-profit-august-2015.pdf
Hello
Hey
We will debate if you believe Biden should go to prison
Alrighty then
I believe he should
Why’s that
He’s a terrorist
He’s a bad person