Message from @Sketchup
Discord ID: 796177326453948486
Personal property I'm not against y'know. *Possession* is fine. Systemic ownership of necessities* is not.
Says who? God? Who gave them the moral authority?
"Systemic Ownership of Necessites"
Are you implying- ***a group of people, hoard specific kinds of goods?***
No, lol.
All authority comes from God because he's the beginning and the end.
```“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”
```
Well which part of the Bible's laws are you against
Rather than give necessities to those who need them, yes.
You're aware that. Through capitalism, said goods are possible to be bartered for, voluntarily. **When there isn't a government force interfering.**
Aren't Capitalists always seeking profit? They do. By selling goods, to the public.
Quite a few, I mean the first commandment alone is p cringe ngl.
As written by a mortal
So it is mortals who have given God this authority.
The written text is inspired by God, and so you have to follow the causal chain up to the top.
***And so did the brain give itself highest importance*** <:cursedflushed:717441837962625054>
As claimed so by mortals
As is the case with everything true.
And so, humans have given God with authority, true or otherwise
Not having a false God?
Humans could simply be incorrect and not give God this authority
Yeah pretty cringe, someone should have false gods if they wanna.
I can't tell if you're trolling or not
Isn't a religion's purpose, to seek itself to be the highest reason?
No, even if we presuppose God is real I don't see why people should be disallowed from worshipping false gods.
"disallowed:|" how about midn ur own buisness
```“A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself.”``` Proverbs 18:2
Systemic control, cultural education in the case of the Torah, lotsa reasons
Are you genuinely that dense? You make me want to break commandment number 6
And your conclusion presupposes those the accuracy of the resurrection story (which conflicts with itself in its multiple accounts), and the existence of God.
Yes, which is based.
No conflict in the resurrection.
If God exists, then why can't we worship gods that aren't real?
Yeah I reject your presuppositions then
You can, you'll just be throttled by the state.
Also yes, the two accounts of the resurrection have conflicting narratives at multiple points.
Been a while since I've looked into it so I can't enumerate specifics at this moment
The entire reason that is there is so you don't worship false gods and not go to Heaven
A business is a government you doof
....what.
It's like being a leader of a country and saying "oh hey, follow whoever you want, you don't have to follow me"