It can be, yes

We transgressed God's perfect law by eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which forced us to depart from our perfect creator and experience things like famine, natural disasters, pestilence, and hardship.

Ownership is found even within other species. Like birds that get teritorrial over their nests, or felines.
**Oh look at that! Same narrative is found about homosexuality.**

I don't think the law as outlined in the Bible is perfect. I think this law is unjust.

We shouldn't look towards the animal kingdom for advice on how to live as humans, lest we become like animals ourselves.

Which part? The part about there being consequences for actions?

You don't have the moral authority to make such a determination.

Personal property I'm not against y'know. *Possession* is fine. Systemic ownership of necessities* is not.

Says who? God? Who gave them the moral authority?

"Systemic Ownership of Necessites"
Are you implying- ***a group of people, hoard specific kinds of goods?***

No, lol.

All authority comes from God because he's the beginning and the end.

```“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”
```

Well which part of the Bible's laws are you against

Rather than give necessities to those who need them, yes.

You're aware that. Through capitalism, said goods are possible to be bartered for, voluntarily. **When there isn't a government force interfering.**

Aren't Capitalists always seeking profit? They do. By selling goods, to the public.

Quite a few, I mean the first commandment alone is p cringe ngl.

As written by a mortal

So it is mortals who have given God this authority.

The written text is inspired by God, and so you have to follow the causal chain up to the top.

***And so did the brain give itself highest importance*** <:cursedflushed:717441837962625054>

As claimed so by mortals

As is the case with everything true.

And so, humans have given God with authority, true or otherwise

Not having a false God?

Humans could simply be incorrect and not give God this authority

Hasty assumption, predicated on God not existing, a theory which is debunked by the resurrection.

Yeah pretty cringe, someone should have false gods if they wanna.

I can't tell if you're trolling or not

Isn't a religion's purpose, to seek itself to be the highest reason?

No, even if we presuppose God is real I don't see why people should be disallowed from worshipping false gods.

"disallowed:|" how about midn ur own buisness

```“A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself.”``` Proverbs 18:2

Systemic control, cultural education in the case of the Torah, lotsa reasons

Are you genuinely that dense? You make me want to break commandment number 6

And your conclusion presupposes those the accuracy of the resurrection story (which conflicts with itself in its multiple accounts), and the existence of God.

Yes, which is based.

No conflict in the resurrection.

If God exists, then why can't we worship gods that aren't real?

Yeah I reject your presuppositions then