was the holodomor justified, because the society agreed to iy?

Youre starting to debate the right question! Nice

@Norman “thAtS wHy iTs SubJEcTive”

I'm proud of you

not an argument

You’re retarded

no

Please study epistemology

please

Its not hard

i have all 41 chromosomes thank you very much

Isnt it 46?@Norman

only 4 mutants

The normal number is 46

I don't think it was justifiable morally because it happened. I'm not sure the society that it happened in found it justifiable either.

You can have immoral actions occur.

so if the society found it justifiable, you would not object to it?

So is the question you're asking me:

If there was a society that found genocide moral, would I also find it moral?

What does that have to do with the fact they are literally subjective

Stop setting up priori

If so, no. But your question presupposes that morals are subjective, defeating your own argument that they're objective

Because in your priori you acknowledge a society with a different moral system

Me?

No, bleach

kay

im back

please repeat question

or answer mine

So is the question you're asking me:

If there was a society that found genocide moral, would I also find it moral?

If so, no. But your question presupposes that morals are subjective, defeating your own argument that they're objective

not neccesarily all genocide

Because in your priori you acknowledge a society with a different moral system

the genocide on the moral grounds stalin justified it with

okay how about this

if you live in russia at the time

would you say it is bad to holodomor, or say it is justified because it is moral?

Guy using tangible ethical problems to a epistemological position

cringe

That's an impossible counter factual to answer

But do you see how you're implying that people can have alternative moral systems there?

no

i am making good question

Come on. You know that's not going to do anything. We know you're very well versed. You have to speak to the audience you have