Message from @Norman
Discord ID: 791814611795574784
OR did society agree on it
Because what universal standard is there for morality?
You cant falsify morality being universal
if its only wrong because society says so, then its not really morally wrong is it?
was the holodomor justified, because the society agreed to iy?
Youre starting to debate the right question! Nice
@Norman “thAtS wHy iTs SubJEcTive”
I'm proud of you
not an argument
You’re retarded
no
Please study epistemology
please
Its not hard
i have all 41 chromosomes thank you very much
only 4 mutants
The normal number is 46
I don't think it was justifiable morally because it happened. I'm not sure the society that it happened in found it justifiable either.
You can have immoral actions occur.
So is the question you're asking me:
If there was a society that found genocide moral, would I also find it moral?
What does that have to do with the fact they are literally subjective
Stop setting up priori
If so, no. But your question presupposes that morals are subjective, defeating your own argument that they're objective
Because in your priori you acknowledge a society with a different moral system
Me?
No, bleach
kay
im back
please repeat question
or answer mine
So is the question you're asking me:
If there was a society that found genocide moral, would I also find it moral?
If so, no. But your question presupposes that morals are subjective, defeating your own argument that they're objective
not neccesarily all genocide
Because in your priori you acknowledge a society with a different moral system
the genocide on the moral grounds stalin justified it with
okay how about this
if you live in russia at the time
would you say it is bad to holodomor, or say it is justified because it is moral?
Guy using tangible ethical problems to a epistemological position