Message from @Norman

Discord ID: 791814611795574784


2020-12-24 23:46:00 UTC  

OR did society agree on it

2020-12-24 23:46:02 UTC  

Because what universal standard is there for morality?

2020-12-24 23:46:17 UTC  

You cant falsify morality being universal

2020-12-24 23:46:19 UTC  

if its only wrong because society says so, then its not really morally wrong is it?

2020-12-24 23:46:31 UTC  

@Norman how can you like dictatorship but also be a Christian?

2020-12-24 23:46:32 UTC  

was the holodomor justified, because the society agreed to iy?

2020-12-24 23:46:35 UTC  

Youre starting to debate the right question! Nice

2020-12-24 23:46:46 UTC  

@Norman “thAtS wHy iTs SubJEcTive”

2020-12-24 23:46:47 UTC  

I'm proud of you

2020-12-24 23:46:54 UTC  

not an argument

2020-12-24 23:47:00 UTC  

You’re retarded

2020-12-24 23:47:04 UTC  

no

2020-12-24 23:47:11 UTC  

Please study epistemology

2020-12-24 23:47:14 UTC  

please

2020-12-24 23:47:16 UTC  

Its not hard

2020-12-24 23:47:16 UTC  

i have all 41 chromosomes thank you very much

2020-12-24 23:47:46 UTC  

Isnt it 46?@Norman

2020-12-24 23:47:55 UTC  

only 4 mutants

2020-12-24 23:47:58 UTC  

The normal number is 46

2020-12-24 23:48:08 UTC  

I don't think it was justifiable morally because it happened. I'm not sure the society that it happened in found it justifiable either.

You can have immoral actions occur.

2020-12-24 23:48:34 UTC  

so if the society found it justifiable, you would not object to it?

2020-12-24 23:49:07 UTC  

So is the question you're asking me:

If there was a society that found genocide moral, would I also find it moral?

2020-12-24 23:49:15 UTC  

What does that have to do with the fact they are literally subjective

2020-12-24 23:49:33 UTC  

Stop setting up priori

2020-12-24 23:49:50 UTC  

If so, no. But your question presupposes that morals are subjective, defeating your own argument that they're objective

2020-12-24 23:50:19 UTC  

Because in your priori you acknowledge a society with a different moral system

2020-12-24 23:50:20 UTC  

Me?

2020-12-24 23:50:25 UTC  

No, bleach

2020-12-24 23:50:29 UTC  

kay

2020-12-24 23:50:35 UTC  

im back

2020-12-24 23:50:39 UTC  

please repeat question

2020-12-24 23:50:44 UTC  

or answer mine

2020-12-24 23:50:57 UTC  

So is the question you're asking me:

If there was a society that found genocide moral, would I also find it moral?

2020-12-24 23:51:02 UTC  

If so, no. But your question presupposes that morals are subjective, defeating your own argument that they're objective

2020-12-24 23:51:04 UTC  

not neccesarily all genocide

2020-12-24 23:51:07 UTC  

Because in your priori you acknowledge a society with a different moral system

2020-12-24 23:51:14 UTC  

the genocide on the moral grounds stalin justified it with

2020-12-24 23:51:23 UTC  

okay how about this

2020-12-24 23:51:28 UTC  

if you live in russia at the time

2020-12-24 23:51:55 UTC  

would you say it is bad to holodomor, or say it is justified because it is moral?

2020-12-24 23:52:20 UTC  

Guy using tangible ethical problems to a epistemological position