uh huh

I can believe in the moral system I was raised into and acknowledge that others won't. My personal unresponsiveness to moral situations doesn't change that it's possible to have other systems

you cant condemn the actions of another society internally

how

This is the argument you keep making

Norman

well the morality is "subjective"

Yes

so by your standards they did nothing wrong

You realize moral relativism doesn’t mean people agree with morals existing right

Not personally

not personally

It's possible that they didn't even think so

People don't always DO moral things

if you lived in russia at the time, would you say what was done was wrong?

Like norman are you the type of person to tell a nihilist to kill themselves because they think life has no meaning

yes

Lol

gtg for 2 minute

This convo pretty interesting

Lol

Then you clearly dont understand philosophy

Imma take philosophy in college

If you think that every philosophical question must be enacted physically

literally stupid

Like nihilists agree with the position that life has no inherent meaning does that mean they need to kill themselves cause they find evidence to suggest its the truth? No. Thats rëtarded

This is impossible to know as I can only impart the morality I have. Speculative morality of a hypothetical person in a narrow hypothetical set of circumstances is worthless

clearly they agree with the idea without having it to come in conflict with their material lives

Not only are those questions impossible to answer, answering them wouldn't benefit us in any way

this is dodging the question

i am point out how in a subjective world view, you can't universally condemn such acts

Correct

That's the point

You can't

additionally, if the society's culture you lived in changed so that people thought it was okay to say, kill Ukrainians, you again cant condemn it, except saying "it is currently not acceptable in our society to do such a thing!"

And if you say you can, it's incumbent upon you to prove that

okay then

so if a political party in america said we should indoctrinate the youth into hating tibetans and wanting to genocide them, what basis would you have to oppose that action?

You're saying "if society changed its moral stance, then morals would be different"

Yes. You're starting to become a subjectivist

no

I would because I am morally opposed to genocide