👍 **Joined** `💬—debate—` :page_facing_up: **And bound to** `🔊—vc-text—`

<:youtube:335112740957978625> **Searching** 🔎 `astronaut in the ocean`

**Playing** 🎶 `Masked Wolf - Astronaut In The Ocean` - Now!

!play never gonna give you up

❌ **You have to be in a voice channel to use this command.**

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers'_Party_of_Belgium

GG @Moose, you just advanced to level 2!

@Vagabond If you would still like to vc, I can now.

Go to horny jail

Yeah

Hop in

I’m in general.

Ay.

Weirdo.

You’re wrong, there. <:pepelaughingemote:767137824998686751>

Ain’t gonna track your phone.

You’re cutting out.

Bruh, I ain’t gonna talk. If this is too much trouble, just hang up

Same to you, man

Thanks. I appreciate it.

@Grape anytime we get in vc Everyone else does lol

they're here for me

not u

im special

get rekt

Yeah lol

Yeah, so you agree violence and hatred is wrong, but you don’t agree you can monitor those type of things

If you disagree violence and hatred are wrong, you’re a threat to other people. People shouldn’t he allowed to **intentionally** do that, not by the state, nor by other people.

I’m putting intentionally in bold to cross out ideologies like socialism.

I agree, you could.

An ideology advocating for violent revolution is also something that one should be able to attack another for.

Yeah, they haven’t done it yet, but inciting violence is wrong already.

In fact people get arrested for that.

I don’t understand why you think inciting violence should be legal, but reacting to it must be peaceful

It’s a sort of self defense

You can think violence thoughts, but sharing violent thoughts causes violence. Therefore it’s a threat

Allowing people to spread thoughts that do damage to democracy or citizens that belong to that democracy, that’s totalitarianism.

Saying that a part of the population is not worthy of being a citizen, like nazis do, is a threat to democracy. You’re excluding people from participating without proper grounds.

So, your opinion is as much totalitarian as mine. Especially when you’re allowing people to spread opinions that may cause violence against these groups.

Here nazism is just an example btw, other violent ideologies might be as well

Your argument against me is that limiting people’s speech is totalitarian, right?

My response to that is that *allowing* this sort of free speech is also totalitarian, as it works against democracy and the physical freedom of citizens.

I disagree.