Message from @vanasten
Discord ID: 786134616540577822
The exception to that is sTate v tate
That's company v state
did you read the entire thing?
Yes why would you assume I didnt
its up to SCOTUS to decide if they want to take it or not, "appropriateness doctrine"
"decline to hear some cases between two states, even where the Court's jurisdiction was exclusive"
State v state is always original jurisdiction
..
That was regarding the chemical company vs the states
Not states vs states
bro
youre not understanding at all
The irony
I knew you weren’t conservative
yes it is irony
Bruh wtf
it doesnt matter if its 1 state or 2 state, its under SCOTUS jurisdiction, BUT they DONT have to take it
they dont give a shit
if thy dont want it, they wont take it
its that simple
i dont understand the confusing here
The last imagoi sent uses the article you cited as an example
I encourage you to read it
Rate my setup guys
???
you cant be forreal lol
do you even understand how the process works
It does matter if it is a company vs multiple states or a state vs a state
okay, im going to say it again
even if it falls under SCOTUS jurisdiction "original"
No way that’s your set up
they... dont.. have to take it.. if they dont want it..
doesnt matter... if its.. original... or.. not.
And then the Yandeer tab
thats called consent
okay youre jiust ignorant at this point
Do you guys think Robin Hood was a communist?