because the people have drank from the cup of the spirit Babylon, which cup contains all whoredoms and abomiantions of the earth, so they must be made to drink the wine of God's wrath

a huge amount of the Bible both OT and NT is devoted to warning you about Babylon and her cup of poison and what will be done with Babylon

God-hating pedophiles who don't even live in our country control our media big tech and education publishing

and indoctrinate our kids

foreign lobbyists have been slowly tearing this place from the seems

and adding fuel to the fire

This place is the beast

if the people had not become whores in the first place, taking multiple lovers which they ought not do, you would not have all the fags and trannies and pedos, but once a society has so many of its people drinking out of Babylon's cup everything that is wrong starts to appears

whoredom imo is itself a result of rejecting God tho

@Japheth yep

watering down Christianity and popularizing atheism

yea it is a rejection of love really

imo anglo america started out roughly as a theocracy with the puritans and massachussets bay colony

then it got liberalized with the constitution

no it didn't, the pilgrims were still subjects of Britain

what about the plymouth colony

but that is where the puritanical sorta roots that are still somewhat around in the Old North part of USA coem from indeed

lol the keyword there is colony, a colony belogns to a greater national power

k

was still a theocracy tho

no it wasn't, but it did lay down a firm religious culture in the USA

the church leaders and governing authorities were one in the same, no?

no, it's a colony of Britain

though you could argue in Britain the monarch is the head of the church

no i mean the church leaders that were in america were also in charge of governing

not always

sometiems they were though because you just figure they're the most educated

but i mean you have military figures of course also in leadership positions

if you look at certain colonies they were justifying their laws and statutes with Biblical arguments

seems like a theocracy to me

it's not a theocracy, not that there's anything wrong with theocracy, it's jsut not how it was though, but indeed it laid down an undeniable Christian foudnation for America

we might disagree on semantics of what a theocracy is then

but the important point is it had christian foundations

well from what you say we probably actually agree what a theocracy is

heck to bring us around to the biblical question; the SCOTUS building has in its artwork and motiffs heavy call back to religion since religion is fundamental to the Theory of Law

jsut about all SCOTUS justices are either jews or catholics too interestingly

the early colonies were basing all their laws and administration on Biblical arguments, and the church leaders and chapelins were in charge of governing. i dont see how this isnt a theocratic way of organizing things?

this has become a minor issue obviously with the vetting of that woman Barrett that Trump seems likely to nominate tomorrow.

i mean the early early settlers

not the thirteen colonies later on

well the early colonies weren't independent nations for one so one could still chock it up to them being vassals of Britain (and indeed this racial and colonial past is where the heavy influence of English Common Law enters America's foundation.) Also things weren't so clear cut when they did establish the colonies cause you know a bunch of pagan savages were encroaching on our land until they got manifest destiny'd outta here