Message from @Repeat
Discord ID: 787222771839008798
Where can I donate?
They are different entities
How realistic is the idea that SCOTUS caved to threats of court packing?
I think this is not the case they were waiting to rule on. Has to be right.
You mean how realistic is Trumps claims 24 scotus justices will be added?
Post this once daily
Thanks for the help
I think I've posted this 3 times just today
Good job. Thanks for supporting Trump
Is kinda sad Trump is defrauding poor retirees during a pandemic he wont help with 🤷 💩
be sure to send him double ... because I'm not sending him a dime
No need for you to send. Just keep spreading the word. That’s your part
any time ... folks want to send their hard earned money to a billionaire because they believe said billionaire cares for them and their lives, I'm all for it
Way to support
Texas sued under Article II but SCOTUS rejected it under Article III. As one door shuts, another opens.
What does that mean?
In my opinion I think it means there are more lawsuits coming which are more fine tuned.
I wish SCOTUS hadn't kick it on standing... Some of these cases needed to be heard for merits somewhere. But I think that was the end of it. No one really has standing anywhere. The only thing that can happen now is for the US house of Reps to contest the results, given its current make up getting more than 50% would be a big ask though.
I f&*king hate the 2 party tribalistic system we have... Its stupid. On top of it all the zealots on both sides are F-ing ridiculous. These representatives/senators and such should be a representative of their districts not shills for their party affiliations.
I don’t believe that. There’s PLENTY fight left. Stay strong
Also Trump filed today
Tracy will help you wrap your head around it
I am not now nor ever will I be a Trump guy... Would I prefer him over Biden? Absolutely, but I am a right of center person who believes in the Constitution. And everything that goes with it. I see government excess and party affiliation as abominations of what our country stands for. I mean George Washington himself cautioned that parties could lead the United States into perils.
Then you should be a trump guy because he is saving this nation from CHINA. All of this is about CHINA. They have corrupted our politicians with mass $$$$$$$$ for YEARS. Trump is removing them the best way he can and that is through the law and his executive order 2018
I don’t know that either party will survive this but America will be better for it
JMO
When a court says your claims have no merit, your witnesses are lying your experts are not qualified its being judged on its merits. Standing hasnt been the only reason they are losing.
This only proves the state cannot fix their own problems. Which leads to insurrection act
🙄
Yep, thankfully our forefathers had a little experience with tyranny
The Kelly vs. PA case had the win on merit and the improper combo of Latches and Standing killed it.
CCP, fail
We will show CCP that our freedom cannot be sold
Kelly case was fine if they let state congress bait and switch that's not an election.
SCOTUS should have legit sent Kelly back to the State Supreme Court telling them that latches were improperly used to dismiss the case filing a suit 1 day after harm is not what latches was meant for.
It was properly used. They wrote a law for mailin votes. They literally told their party not to use the system. Voters followed all the rules they made to cast their ballot. Then they tried to say whoops our bad we couldnt do that we just going to go ahead and delete a million votes. Nah man how bout you fix that outside an election.
Act 77, was challenged in the courts all the way up to October 28th, 2020. So, 1 week after it was no longer in an active court case and only 1 day after a harm in fact. that seems to me to be poor application of the latches principle. Also, Kelly wasn't challenging the legislation, it was the modifications to the process by the secretary of state and the executive branch that were in direct contradiction to the legislation that was passed that were being challenged. And until the election actually occurred no one had the standing to challenge it. Or that was my understanding from reading the complaints, responses and reply. I am going to say it again I'm not a lawyer so I absolutely could be wrong. I am hear because Robert is one of the few people who can properly explain this BS.