maybe

And additionally what is your basis for saying he was carrying a firearm illegally? He was open carrying

it is interpretable and probably has case law

Robert has said that it would probably not be constitutional to make such an argument either

That’s where we need Rob for some case law haha

I think he said he didn't know offhand

Robert brought up the constitutional response

Oh okay

if blue win, can I get political refuge in US?

He was also retreating/fleeing by most reasonable standards

Take my spot

Who is He that’s retreating or fleeing?

@xephael https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/2014/chapter-939/section-939.48

@xephael I agree

@realz thanks for the link

Appreciate That!

I would say that curfew will be the underlying problem with the argument then.

Rittenhouse has awful lawyers

Technically it may be viewed as a criminal activity due to the curfew violation however the court of jurisdiction would be J&D

> And additionally what is your basis for saying he was carrying a firearm illegally? He was open carrying
@LrnAshly Wisconsin law has a minimum age of 18 for firearms, with a possible exception for hunting, so it is unclear if it was legal for him to carry

If he gets convicted it’s entirely on his defense team

> if blue win, can I get political refuge in US?
@TomWiliam += One Past Last Jedi ?

> If he gets convicted it’s entirely on his defense team
@Gypsy Yea Barnes constantly rails on them

To purchase a firearm or maintain within ones possession?

@LrnAshly the latter

Ouch

I've read the law and the exception for hunting

I dunno what to make of it

Well. I am gonna make the unpopular opinion then that he doesn’t have a claim for self defense

with that logic though, you can find someone in breach of some law after they defend themselves 🙂

Rittenhouse has legal aid offered by GOA (gun owners of america) and they're not exactly dolts

I actually don't mind Destiny too much.

@xephael the guys running it are the covington case lawyers

He's not your typical demsoc, and actually has rational arguments.

He's a libertarian leftist.

@Maw omg I am still listening to this in the background no wonder I am irate

I would argue that had he not been carrying out the crime of illegally possessing a firearm there would’ve been no need for self defense and technically if someone is in violation of the law requiring him to use self defense his violation is responsible thus he is

He has been cast out from the left for his stance on Rittenhouse.

Or rather, specifically the far left.

How was him having the rife illegal?

@LrnAshly I'm pretty sure that people carrying illegally, and use it in self defense, are routinely not charged for murder, but I dunno about WI