Message from @Gypsy
Discord ID: 774085424070787074
And I would argue that a curfew law isn’t a criminal law
he was carrying
maybe
And additionally what is your basis for saying he was carrying a firearm illegally? He was open carrying
it is interpretable and probably has case law
Robert has said that it would probably not be constitutional to make such an argument either
That’s where we need Rob for some case law haha
I think he said he didn't know offhand
Robert brought up the constitutional response
Oh okay
if blue win, can I get political refuge in US?
He was also retreating/fleeing by most reasonable standards
Take my spot
Who is He that’s retreating or fleeing?
@realz thanks for the link
Appreciate That!
I would say that curfew will be the underlying problem with the argument then.
Technically it may be viewed as a criminal activity due to the curfew violation however the court of jurisdiction would be J&D
> And additionally what is your basis for saying he was carrying a firearm illegally? He was open carrying
@LrnAshly Wisconsin law has a minimum age of 18 for firearms, with a possible exception for hunting, so it is unclear if it was legal for him to carry
If he gets convicted it’s entirely on his defense team
> if blue win, can I get political refuge in US?
@TomWiliam += One Past Last Jedi ?
> If he gets convicted it’s entirely on his defense team
@Gypsy Yea Barnes constantly rails on them
To purchase a firearm or maintain within ones possession?
Ouch
I've read the law and the exception for hunting
I dunno what to make of it
Well. I am gonna make the unpopular opinion then that he doesn’t have a claim for self defense
with that logic though, you can find someone in breach of some law after they defend themselves 🙂
Rittenhouse has legal aid offered by GOA (gun owners of america) and they're not exactly dolts
I actually don't mind Destiny too much.
He's not your typical demsoc, and actually has rational arguments.
He's a libertarian leftist.
@Maw omg I am still listening to this in the background no wonder I am irate
I would argue that had he not been carrying out the crime of illegally possessing a firearm there would’ve been no need for self defense and technically if someone is in violation of the law requiring him to use self defense his violation is responsible thus he is
He has been cast out from the left for his stance on Rittenhouse.