As I said, he likely didn't cover him.

They wanted left-wing lawyers.

Lol ok I see

I think Uncivil Law is patented lawyer too. He covers all sorts of things.

L. French is a copyright attorney.

Nate is my only left wing lawyer. That’s all I need 😂

A lot of these guys veer out of their lane. Their professional credibility is often predicated upon whether people like what they're saying. I like the ones who tell you up front that it's not their field and they hedge. They should also be able to present a tenable counter-argument to their opinion once in a while imo.

They tend to want to avoid being too political, and that's the case for L. French.

Because it lessens the amount of reach you have.

It alienates a potential audience.

That's my guess as to why a lot of legal youtubers avoid certain cases.

I honestly only watch like 5 lawyers. And Viva isn’t a practicing attorney anymore.

Probably so. I'm more concerned when they present themselves as experts in a particular because they can read legalese and cherry pick case law.

I think they are all providing their legal analysis as objectively as they can.

yea if Lehto would get political, he'd lose half his audience (though maybe he'd gain some more)

but it wouldn't be Lehto anymore

I don't want him ruining his show

but I do want some counter to Viva Frei, Uncivil Law, Nate The Lawyer, and our very own Robert

and I don't see that

oh and Rekieta

@realz 😂 I think he is like moderate right or maybe what used to be consequences Democrat

@Gypsy Lehto?

yea well he keeps you guessing

@realz aye

and that is a good thing

Welcome to Lehtos Law

you heard that in a female voice

@realz I think Viva is pretty objective. You can’t be completely objective or you’re just explaining facts and not interpreting anything

I like Rob. His politics are warped but he is at least able to articulate counterpoints to his own. A lot of guys either can't or don't care to take the time.

@Gypsy I wouldn't know if he is objective, because there is no one countering

#thatstheproblem

@realz eh I guess. LegalEagle seems like the counter argument to me and that guy just makes up facts 😂

I recall his defense of Captain America. Hahaha that’s actually where I began to question his motives

he hardly covers political issues except very recently

Legal Eagle on Rittenhouse plx

Legal Eagle is also one dimensional. Can't argue against himself. That's big for me.

I was like “naw I think that is assault man”

Alright well I could get behind a genuine legal liberal lawyer but maybe they are all busy with cases.

haha

useful lawyers lawyer, the rest get on youtube?

How could they be? I thought all the criminals were running amok.