Message from @Doc
Discord ID: 788040191151439882
Sort of done arguing this though.
I am 98% sure that charge is valid and it may stick. But given that I think the murder charges will drop, they will likely drop the misdemeanor anyway.
Bro
it's about hunting.
It's in the context of hunting.
its not a crime to possess a rifle or shotgun age 16+ in Wisconsin, its not about hunting
There are other hunting rules and regulations for the general populace.
It's 100% about hunting, good luck taking that defense to court where it's proven to fail multiple times already.
the law omits 16-17 year olds anyways lol
show me caselaw, u wont find it
they use to give people here disorderly conducts for open carrying, before we had CCW, a charge does not make it a crime
Again, we'll see. :)
i know gun laws, we will see if he gets convicted for murder, i doubt it
pretty clear self defense, but if he was violating curfew it could become an issue idk
Again, don't think he'll get convicted of murder, and they will likely drop all charges if his murder charges are dismissed.
the only thing he was doing that was illegal was a curfew violation.. some said he had permission to be at the business but idk about that
im not on the jury but it sure looked like self defense
in this case I mean.
According to the "child law" you just quoted a 17-y-o. cant have a firearm. According to the...what was it...hunting laws, he/she can.
as the first one does not have the exceptions of the latter written into it (which is the norm here), is that solved by hierarchy?
or context?
the statute has different sections, one is for hunting , the other is for possession or control of a firearm, in any case 16-17yr olds are totally omitted from the statute
nope. different laws.
or....you call it "chapters" I think.
the law in Wisconsin is you can possess a rifle or shotgun (not a SBS), if you are 16+, 14-16 if you have passed hunters safety, thats the training requirement for CCW here also
sub-sections
I was asking about the hierarchy of Wisconsin law. How it operates.
its done by omission
that makes no sense.
compare the 2 subsections
you cant have a hierarchy by omission. You can have it by law or by presedense.
Why is everyone fixated on Rittenhouse? Is everyone scared to defend Freedom? Is everyone scared of dying on the front lines of defending Democracy? And, I'm not referring to being violent I'm referring to protesting strong and refusing to accept what is going on in The Country that every goddamn being on the planet wants to come to and of which many have
i wasnt referring to hierarchy
@Massie1223 I am not, I am here to learn law.
no im a firearms instructor thats lived in Wisconsin for 40 years