https://youtu.be/UMO-sWMhwBM

Where is it???

@RobertGrulerEsq I live in PA. Been watching your show for a while. Don't comment very often. The PA Supreme Court also ruled that signatures on mail in ballots don't need to match, so a lot of people are freaking out about that. An article I read says that the law doesn't mention requiring signatures to be verified. I'm super mad about the PA SC for extending the deadline, and feel it is a major overreach of power, but in my mind the SC was within their power to say-the law doesn't mention signatures, so if election officials are satisfied with the vote save for the signature, they cannot reject it. Any thoughts? Personally, I think matching signatures are a no brainer, but if it's not in the law-it's not in the law. Any thoughts or additional info you might be aware of??? Thanks!

Hi Theresa thanks for the great comment. It is definitely an issue and as you know something we've been following. I've got a PA litigation update queued up for the end of the show today. Two issues right now: 1. Trump's suit to stop canvassing until they can monitor has a hearing scheduled tonight at 7 p.m. and 2. Trump filed to join the US Supreme Court case regarding the ballot extension and those issues. I think it is going to get messy.

It means deceased people (and cats) may able to be cast valid ballots more often.

What concerns me the most is ballot harvesting to be completely frank, but that's due to a number of reasons.

@RobertGrulerEsq I figured you would talk about PA today. Part of me is a little hurt that you kept calling my state a mess last night, but most of me wholeheartedly agrees. We've been a mess with Covid restrictions and with the election. So you just keep calling us a mess. It's probably a nicer word than we deserve.

It sounds like Maricopa County has yet to be counted yet (?), so there's a chance that Trump can still turn AZ, from what I understand. The man behind the curtain, Arnon Mishkin, treats the suggestion with disdain, but. . . it's a possibility.

I was just looking at that. There are only 4 districts not yet reported. https://results.arizona.vote/#/featured/18/0

Ah ok, good to know. Thanks!

i saw that the AP called MI for Biden just some time ago. but the margin is 1.3%.

also this from bloomberg on MI

It makes sense since they're going to trend Biden from now on.

how do you have more than 100%? or am i just ignorant?

Predicted estimates.

Higher turnout than predicted.

okay

If Nevada gets called and lawsuits / recounts notwithstanding this will be over

yeah the ap pins biden at 264 electorates

https://youtu.be/CT62JpDY1Jc

Veritas has it's obvious lean

but doesn't mean they aren't necessarily wrong

Where can I find information in a useful form, not the stupid map?

They don't even put the stupid fucking EC votes on the stupid fucking maps. Fucking Asshole media asshole fucks.

Just know that Trump needs to win 2 of 3 Michigan Wisconsin and Pennsylvania

tell us how you really feel @USALibertarian lol

but Rob was sharing bloomberg's states on the whole thing

i think arizona was called way too early and we shouldn't just dismiss it as a Biden victory

in Arizona

fair

okay. And fuxk Discord too.

NYT has an EC view

what is so wrong with discord

lol

NYT and WaPo haven't called Arizona yet

that's good

If you don't believe the AZ results go to the Secretary of State websites. The results are all there in black and white

Why such hostility for Discord?

It's a pretty good system, all-in-all.

doesnt trump win with PA and nevada?