Red Illinois. Surreal.

500 samples, a bunch of instances of benford's law

159 samples

both of these are using normally distributed numbers between 0 and 19000000

It def seemed like a million or more votes were cheated in @realz

how would we know?

I was just showing evidence that benford's law is dubious with such a low number of samples

Sadly,we may not but it dosnt need to be shown on that large of a level.All that needs to happen like rob said is 10's of thousands

if you can prove it

@realz I believe thats already in the bag honestly

what is?

Takes time to collect evidence...President trump is on the defensive so he will always have to counter punch.

10's of thousands of votes...Id say over 300,000.

what makes you say this?

I'd like to be this convinced too

300,000 is a fairly specific threshold. How did you determine that floor?

> Red Illinois. Surreal.
@Zuluzeit
I know right, I saw that in the data and surprised the heck out of me. I knew California was on the line though.

Well,I feel like we would have never seen ANY evidence if they hadnt screwed up to a large degree.There's all kinds of evidence starting to come out.Even the court filings.They need time to do the investigation tho.I mean look what they did to President Trump for 4 years of his presidency.Im sure those that oppose him wanted him removed right then also.

Wow I didn't even notice California. Even more bizarre. I'm in Illinois.

@Reaper294 I have no priors that imply there was a coordinate attempt to cheat, so all the evidence that is coming out must stand the test of proof

Im in PA and Ill be honest biden wasnt much mentioned down here.But I did feel wierd at my polling place as they didnt ask for my license and kept walking away from the ballot machine.I thought that was Odd honestly

@realz Did you watch robs video tonight?beyond that benfords law is FAR from the only evidence.We just cant see it becouse people keep getting cencored

guh

@DrSammyD I am not sure what it means to weight a county by the census numbers; wouldn't that be much closer to the popular vote?

@DrSammyD or is the point that using 2020 census specifically skews it that much?

@Reaper294 I have not yet seen convincing evidence

Where I am, it's rare to hear anything good about Trump. I think it might depend on with whom you're hanging.

@Reaper294 I did just watch Rob's show, just finished this moment in fact, and I agree with Rob

Rob is not convinced one way or another

I didnt say he was

we are both eagerly awaiting the evidence to be examined properly

Is this a debate or are you discussing this like I am?just curious?

Looks like all the characteristics of a discussion to me.

Im CALMLY waiting and discussing it lol.Not interested in going down that road until Im comfortable here.

just asking

it is whatever you prefer 🙂

> @DrSammyD I am not sure what it means to weight a county by the census numbers; wouldn't that be much closer to the popular vote?
@realz
If you have 20 people in a county, 10 people vote, 4 for trump, 6 for biden, Biden get's 12 votes, and Trump get's 8

I was discussing,as I said.Not becouse there is a lack of proof but becouse its to early to be having this DEBATE.

That seems to have been her point.

@DrSammyD I see, so it is counting the popular vote of all eligible (or even non-eligible) voters, while the popular vote is only voters

Id think None eligable voters shouldnt count.