Message from @Doc

Discord ID: 776205905015341087


2020-11-11 21:59:51 UTC  

They had to have known

2020-11-11 22:00:47 UTC  

The first person I heard discuss the watermark story used to do psyops and Co wrote Tom Clancy spy Novels

2020-11-11 22:01:07 UTC  

the psychiatrist?

2020-11-11 22:01:17 UTC  

bissneck...sissneck...

2020-11-11 22:01:21 UTC  

What would the watermark even be able to prove ?

2020-11-11 22:01:22 UTC  

whats his name...

2020-11-11 22:01:24 UTC  

Yes

2020-11-11 22:02:00 UTC  

Ballots that were meant to be disposed of could be watermarked and used.

2020-11-11 22:02:04 UTC  

Steve pieczenik

2020-11-11 22:02:14 UTC  

ya! Thats him.

2020-11-11 22:02:16 UTC  

Double edged sword. Ahh so you only sent watermarks to trup heavy areas right ? That would mean many biden votes are invalid

2020-11-11 22:02:18 UTC  

Isotope watermark

2020-11-11 22:02:23 UTC  

The father of the Deep State hypothesis

2020-11-11 22:02:59 UTC  

what isotope?

2020-11-11 22:03:09 UTC  

gamma or neutron emitter? 😄

2020-11-11 22:03:38 UTC  

Stasi used to do that. Mark political opposition with gamma-decaying isotopes.

2020-11-11 22:03:42 UTC  

The watermark would be super flimsy, it would have to be super deep, lots of conspirators, whats the goal or aim of the watermark what does it prove if its real?

2020-11-11 22:04:09 UTC  

> Stasi used to do that. Mark political opposition with gamma-decaying isotopes.
@Doc
Really?

2020-11-11 22:04:19 UTC  

I suggest infiltration would be easier and cheaper and produce better evidence.

2020-11-11 22:04:42 UTC  

@Michele411 Yes, it was used to track opposition, their things and who they met.

2020-11-11 22:05:08 UTC  

leading to an unnaturally high cancer rate

2020-11-11 22:05:21 UTC  

jazz musicians, for instance.

2020-11-11 22:08:50 UTC  

Interesting.
I don't think trump has had a ton of people that he could trust.

Chris Christie for example was on inner circle for debate practice I believe.

2020-11-11 22:09:26 UTC  

I have a somewhat different understanding of the presidency, but you might be right.

2020-11-11 22:10:14 UTC  

What is your understanding of it?

2020-11-11 22:10:30 UTC  

largely ceremonial after Carter.

2020-11-11 22:13:21 UTC  

I cant verify this, when, where, or real, take with a grain of salt.
https://youtu.be/NwOTBkQKjGw

2020-11-11 22:21:08 UTC  

Doc, it's nice to have someone with first hand knowledge.

2020-11-11 22:22:19 UTC  

2nd at best, but thanks. 😛

2020-11-11 22:22:58 UTC  

and if that was sarcasm, it elegantly danced over my head

2020-11-11 22:41:52 UTC  

> and if that was sarcasm, it elegantly danced over my head
@Doc
No, my sarcasm is pretty obvious.
Your second hand knowledge is 12 degrees closer than mine. I sincerely appreciate your knowledge from your experience.

2020-11-11 22:45:45 UTC  

a mostly peaceful protest sounds like something you would read in a mostly truthful newspaper.

2020-11-11 22:47:17 UTC  

a newspaper that mostly only cares about money

2020-11-11 22:48:46 UTC  

the word mostly was not needed in that last statement

2020-11-11 23:04:38 UTC  

`mostly truthful newspaper`haha

2020-11-11 23:04:43 UTC  

@Doc did you make that up

2020-11-11 23:05:04 UTC  

Yes.

2020-11-11 23:05:10 UTC  

very good 👏

2020-11-11 23:05:13 UTC  

ty