Message from @evildood89

Discord ID: 776204950191603713


2020-11-11 21:48:47 UTC  

ah that is interesting

2020-11-11 21:49:02 UTC  

I know Barnes and Frei talk about her a lot (w.r.t Flynn case)

2020-11-11 21:51:08 UTC  

She dors seem pretty level headed, she was a former federal prosecutor.

2020-11-11 21:52:48 UTC  

> just the other day we had a "former CIA director [sic]" telling us about the OMG STING OPERATION trump was _really_ running
@realz

I would love if they floating the watermark story to get the rats to turn on each other. ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-11-11 21:53:08 UTC  

I would love it if the story was true!

2020-11-11 21:53:09 UTC  

lol

2020-11-11 21:55:58 UTC  

a question too would be; if you expected fraud, how would you go about it.

2020-11-11 21:56:17 UTC  

to set up the opponent doing the fraud.

2020-11-11 21:57:20 UTC  

> a question too would be; if you expected fraud, how would you go about it.
@Doc

If they didn't expect fraud they are idiots and deserve to lose

2020-11-11 21:57:45 UTC  

you could argue that, yes.

2020-11-11 21:58:10 UTC  

an election system is never stronger than the loyalty to democratic ideals of those who take part in it.

2020-11-11 21:58:18 UTC  

so....expect it to not work....

2020-11-11 21:58:19 UTC  

If I suspected fraud I would use chain of custody to demonstrate mail ballots that were fraudulent. If I knew before hand.

2020-11-11 21:58:21 UTC  

Man has devised a way to cheat at every game ever invented.

2020-11-11 21:59:04 UTC  

If you ainโ€™t cheating you ainโ€™t trying. -some dude who wins Super Bowls ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-11-11 21:59:24 UTC  

When the push was on fit Mail in without request... They should have known

2020-11-11 21:59:51 UTC  

They had to have known

2020-11-11 22:00:47 UTC  

The first person I heard discuss the watermark story used to do psyops and Co wrote Tom Clancy spy Novels

2020-11-11 22:01:07 UTC  

the psychiatrist?

2020-11-11 22:01:17 UTC  

bissneck...sissneck...

2020-11-11 22:01:21 UTC  

What would the watermark even be able to prove ?

2020-11-11 22:01:22 UTC  

whats his name...

2020-11-11 22:01:24 UTC  

Yes

2020-11-11 22:02:00 UTC  

Ballots that were meant to be disposed of could be watermarked and used.

2020-11-11 22:02:04 UTC  

Steve pieczenik

2020-11-11 22:02:14 UTC  

ya! Thats him.

2020-11-11 22:02:16 UTC  

Double edged sword. Ahh so you only sent watermarks to trup heavy areas right ? That would mean many biden votes are invalid

2020-11-11 22:02:18 UTC  

Isotope watermark

2020-11-11 22:02:23 UTC  

The father of the Deep State hypothesis

2020-11-11 22:02:59 UTC  

what isotope?

2020-11-11 22:03:09 UTC  

gamma or neutron emitter? ๐Ÿ˜„

2020-11-11 22:03:38 UTC  

Stasi used to do that. Mark political opposition with gamma-decaying isotopes.

2020-11-11 22:03:42 UTC  

The watermark would be super flimsy, it would have to be super deep, lots of conspirators, whats the goal or aim of the watermark what does it prove if its real?

2020-11-11 22:04:09 UTC  

> Stasi used to do that. Mark political opposition with gamma-decaying isotopes.
@Doc
Really?

2020-11-11 22:04:19 UTC  

I suggest infiltration would be easier and cheaper and produce better evidence.

2020-11-11 22:04:42 UTC  

@Michele411 Yes, it was used to track opposition, their things and who they met.

2020-11-11 22:05:08 UTC  

leading to an unnaturally high cancer rate

2020-11-11 22:05:21 UTC  

jazz musicians, for instance.

2020-11-11 22:08:50 UTC  

Interesting.
I don't think trump has had a ton of people that he could trust.

Chris Christie for example was on inner circle for debate practice I believe.

2020-11-11 22:09:26 UTC  

I have a somewhat different understanding of the presidency, but you might be right.

2020-11-11 22:10:14 UTC  

What is your understanding of it?