Interesting: Dominion Code review
https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/dominion-voting/democracy-suite.pdf

@leftingfighter33, you just advanced to level 2!

And Rudy and Powell can claim all they want that they have all the evidence in the world, but if it doesn't come to light I'm not exactly going to be looking to believe that our system is that broken and so many people were hoping to cheat the outcome.

If you make outlandish claims such as these, you best have concrete proof.

And you should probably share it to the public when you make those claims.

> I might even say that this is Tucker's play to get Trumps attention that his lawyers are clowning him. -@DrSammyD
>
> I've heard from sources that this is exactly what happens last night
@DrSammyD
@RobertGrulerEsq I can share my source if you want to put it on the show tonight

The code review is pretty standard for most applications. @leftingfighter33

Most people don't follow stringent code standards.

There are a few vulnerabilities there of significant note, but otherwise it looks relatively normal.

Obviously it's not something I'd accept as a government official.

But it's not really any sort of evidence of intentional backdoors left.

If anything, it's indicative that the programmers didn't know what they were doing.

(Actually it's exactly saying that tbh)

> Yep. That's exactly right.

But Powell said that these machines had an algorithm that changed votes.

That's... uh, something pretty difficult to overlook in this analysis.

She also claimed that the number of votes compromised the system.

Yeah, Powell's full of shit

It literally says in the documentation that it would require 2 billion votes to break.

Because of signed integers.

your full of shit DrSammy

lol

And it does hilariously break once you breach the level of signed integers. It starts counting in negatives from -1 IIRC.

So... don't use it if India and China had a joint election

She specific claim was that there were so many *Trump* votes that it broke the algorithm. I remember her saying that.

She's being fed nonsense by some spook who wants to overthrow Venezuela

This is what happens when you go beyond signed integers

32bit*

Yes, specifically 32 bit.

lol

~~() is just javascript hackery to make something a signed 32.

In native.

It's meant for type coercion.

(In most applications)

It simply flips bits in an integer

Yeah, but it does make it a signed 32.

Javascript is all kinds of wonky.

I usually use it for input validation and type coercion.

~ is mostly used to test if an index is -1

in js