How so

And I'd say the same for anyone

probability is a matter of calculation. Calculation takes datapoints.

He is a person in power with leverage

Anyone in that position can bribe people

Powell made very strong accusations to GA's governor, then Trump's campaign distanced themselves from her

Actually he's not in power with leverage

I don't think it's 3D chess

Yeah that was hilarious @nachik

If all things go as they currently look to be going, he will be out of power in about 2 months

So why would I commit a crime to get power from a guy who if my gamble fails will be out in 2 months

Unless he promises someone a bigger position in government etc @Elzam which he can do if he wins

IF

But by all accounts it looks like he won't

And he has to do this with what, 3/4 states?

And not get caught?

Again I’m not saying it’s definite thing just a tool available that you think he is somehow above using

It's not that I think he's above doing it, it's that it's so unlikely to do it that I don't think we really care

It's possible Biden already bribed the MI representatives

Let's go investigate

Great , however that has nothing to do with the bigger point

????

See how this "possibility" thing is silly?

No you are just offended that someone would allude that trump would bribe someone

It’s not a interesting thing to hyper focus on

No I really don't care whether anyone says that President Trump would bribe anyone

It's just a silly accusation here

So why did you hyper focus on that if you don’t care and think it’s silly

James is still trolling? Lol

Because it is silly

Why don’t you address the bigger point which is utilizing this route is not good for democracy

The route of committing crimes?

Pretty sure I already said that's bad

But I did say the citizens would hold the reps accountable

And I don't particularly mind if the citizens votes within the states don't matter because they weren't supposed to matter anyway

Agreed! Please leave only facts here

I'm in favor of repealing the 17th after all

I had to read through 200 trolling messages with zero facts. Only opinions

Actually originally you said you were happy that things are being done by the constitution, however you then went on to say the system is being used as it was intended, the whole point of my original post was to point out it is not being used as originally intended @Elzam although you decided to hyper focus on the bride part

This is the system that we have now so it is the constitutionally approved way

I might disagree with the changes we've made since the 1800's but that's a personal issue