Message from @Elzam

Discord ID: 780228642352529418


2020-11-23 00:27:11 UTC  

They don’t

2020-11-23 00:27:16 UTC  

How do you know?

2020-11-23 00:27:29 UTC  

The knew that affidavits were spam

2020-11-23 00:27:41 UTC  

Trumps own lawyers quit

2020-11-23 00:27:52 UTC  

(After harassment)

2020-11-23 00:27:55 UTC  

I believe I'm a stone cold fox, it doesn't make it so....

2020-11-23 00:28:06 UTC  

Hahaha

2020-11-23 00:28:23 UTC  

No this had nothing to do with harassment

2020-11-23 00:28:33 UTC  

They left because they knew they had no case

2020-11-23 00:28:34 UTC  

That article doesn't say what you think it is

2020-11-23 00:28:39 UTC  

Read the article and come back

2020-11-23 00:28:44 UTC  

I just read it

2020-11-23 00:28:55 UTC  

And it doesn't say they knowingly submitted "spam"

2020-11-23 00:29:16 UTC  

They pretty much gave benefit of the doubt to those they were unable to verify. Which is a pretty common practice

2020-11-23 00:29:19 UTC  

But the judge said that.

2020-11-23 00:29:48 UTC  

Again, we're not talking about rulings, just intent

2020-11-23 00:29:59 UTC  

JJ thinks that the President's team is trying to commit crimes

2020-11-23 00:29:59 UTC  

@Elzam, you just advanced to level 7!

2020-11-23 00:30:03 UTC  

They said they knew the affidavt were most likely filled with lies and spam and the only thing they used to verify the testimonies were a captcha online. The lawyer even said that this wasn’t a fraud case

2020-11-23 00:30:04 UTC  

I disagree

2020-11-23 00:30:30 UTC  

Did you miss the second line?
> The attorneys then visited the complainants’ homes. The Trump campaign said it excluded the submissions of those who swore to lies, but they included the ones they could not prove were lying into evidence

2020-11-23 00:30:30 UTC  

No, those particular lawyers were just hacks. Not criminals.

2020-11-23 00:30:50 UTC  

It's not a fraud case because it's not a fraud case

2020-11-23 00:31:03 UTC  

There's a difference between colloquial fraud and legal fraud

2020-11-23 00:31:11 UTC  
2020-11-23 00:31:44 UTC  

Yes, they are pushing a 'colloquial fraud' case. I see.

2020-11-23 00:31:48 UTC  
2020-11-23 00:32:12 UTC  

Basically they knew there was no mass widespread voter fraud

2020-11-23 00:32:16 UTC  

To the public they're saying fraud because colloquially it's fraud.

2020-11-23 00:32:26 UTC  

“Fraud”

2020-11-23 00:32:35 UTC  

Watch the second video it’s about the affidavits

2020-11-23 00:32:43 UTC  

'Murder'

2020-11-23 00:32:44 UTC  

Yes, I'm aware of the Rachel Maddow lawsuit in which literally doesn't mean literally

2020-11-23 00:32:51 UTC  

Language is funny sometimes eh?

2020-11-23 00:33:07 UTC  

Rachel maddow?

2020-11-23 00:33:11 UTC  

It sure is. I almost thought they were saying actual fraud.

2020-11-23 00:33:18 UTC  

Shewwww

2020-11-23 00:33:49 UTC  

Anyways what about Powell

2020-11-23 00:34:22 UTC  

She stood up with Giuliani as not a reputable member of the team. What's the question?

2020-11-23 00:34:46 UTC  

Well being fired what happens to the dominion thing