Message from @DrSammyD
Discord ID: 781050410889904138
OK let me rewrite this edge labeling algorithm then
into two parts
... Does Robert remind you of Christian Slater?
haha he does!
lol
I didn't think about it until you said it though
@RobertGrulerEsq Anybody ever tell you you remind them of Christian Slater?
😄
I was a fan of Slater since like 1995 or so
I watched Broken Arrow
Hard Rain
he needs that fuzzbeard
its also the way they speak
True
```generating philadelphia.dot.svg, at 2020-11-25 01:33:13.876427
elapsed: 1032.7551324000815```
that's how long it took :/
sheesh
its only 50 MiB tho now
it showed for a second on chrome
then I resized it
its gonna take a bit 🙂
one2blame.orc
```
G.number_of_nodes(): 90259
G.number_of_edges(): 577686
```
gah
Its more edges to do it separately, because I am basically drawing a lot of horizontal lines
(even if the reports are not close together in time)
well now imma try to draw a png via inkscape
this is one of those moments when I wish I had one of those Ryzen processors
anyway, this _better_ result in something that doesn't look like a ball of yarn
I want to see CONSPIRACY
or BUNK
CONPIRACY is if there are clear straight tracks and clear changes to other precincts
at least then we can decide to check this elswhere
and other elections
BUNK is if this happens all over the graph randomly and there is no clear straight lines and switches
oh I just realized something
@DrSammyD I think we should highlight edges where the ratio stays the same, even though there are lots of votes coming in
compared with places where the ratio stays the same but nothing changed in the interim