that is

🤮

unconstitutional

Prob not

its not

So judges aren't allowed to be religious?

But they didn’t control the senate

I don’t want my judges hyper religious no

OK well that is not a "good" reason to me

Are you aware several current justices before justice barret were practicing Catholic?

They didn’t really need to give a reason

@james j, you just advanced to level 17!

neither would the republicans

They were the minority

this is a bs argument bro

last nominee was a nothing burger

they don't have to give a "reason" and if they did, they could make up some BS

Yeah but since they were the majority they would be responsible for actually blocking the judge where as if you as a democrat object it has no impact

Typically the reason you would not confirm a judge is due to something related to their work in law

No one is gonna be like “why did you let her through?”

She denied a woman to suit the department of correction because she said rape was not part of the correctional officers duty

Defcon

Is that true via statute?

Judges only apply the law. If you don't like a judges ruling but they applied the law as written, change the law not the judge

except in some cases*

I guess no one would care if we had a judge that had ties to blm or antifa

Next judge up

(for example where the intent of the law is very different than how it is being inadvertently applied, to prosecute someone and put them in prison or somesuch)

Are they even required to be real judges with law degrees

She has practically no trial experience as a lawyer... She had very little in court experience as an attorney. She practiced for 3 years - with very little lead attorney experience. She jumped straight to being a judge (after teaching). She heard a little over 100 cases. That is very little practical experience by any measure.

OK fine, but if there was some other nominee, they would still have voted no to a person

the court has become a power grab

because it effectively has unlimited powers

So why we need judges. Have a computer decide cases. They just read the laws and do the verdict.

I looked it up you don’t really need any requirements to be a Supreme Court judge

You could literally be anyone

True

yes but traditionally the senate is allowed to make requirements

the "advise and consent"

Impossible when AI bots can completely flood any opposition in real time, like Discuss in it's infancy or Reddit as well. GOP needs to float the boat to win the 4th Industrial Revolution to keep our freedom intact!

It has... Until the 1930's the Senate didn't even hold hearings. A vacancy happened, the Prez nominated someone, the Senate rubber stamped it. @realz