Message from @JonM16

Discord ID: 782670170317258772


2020-11-29 17:19:31 UTC  

Lol true

2020-11-29 17:19:37 UTC  

Lol

2020-11-29 17:20:21 UTC  

Wouldn’t be me! I would have lost my cool before I got into office lol

2020-11-29 17:20:59 UTC  

It wasn't on purpose. That's who he is.

2020-11-29 17:22:12 UTC  

@AdamS yes, check out Naomi Klein. She's been professionally barking up that tree for a long, long time.

2020-11-29 17:22:25 UTC  

Do you have a link? Thank you.

2020-11-29 17:24:57 UTC  

Not a particular one, no, but it's an easy search. She has a theory from more than a decade ago but came more prominently into the fray with Trump 2016. It addresses far beyond him and preceded him though.

2020-11-29 17:25:25 UTC  

Thank you. I’ll look it up.

2020-11-29 17:26:48 UTC  

"Shock Doctrine" ~ Naomi Klein

2020-11-29 17:27:04 UTC  

Unfortunately titled

2020-11-29 17:27:23 UTC  

Probably worked at the time lol

2020-11-29 17:27:56 UTC  

Nothing can shock in 2020 🤣

2020-11-29 17:28:02 UTC  

Hahaha

2020-11-29 17:32:50 UTC  

Dr. Kershavarz-Nia

2020-11-29 17:47:42 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/782664097929232444/image0.png

2020-11-29 17:48:25 UTC  

I can see both sides to this, but how does any of this help me?

2020-11-29 18:02:46 UTC  

https://www.thedailybeast.com/joe-bidens-dogs-have-told-this-pet-psychic-a-lot-about-their-beloved-master-and-his-future?ref=home

“The very first thing I got was that they were both very excited about moving to the White House,” Lee-Crowther told The Daily Beast.

2020-11-29 18:06:47 UTC  

Start asking the pet open-ended questions: ‘How are you feeling today?’ ‘What’s your favorite thing to do?’ Nothing too rigid, so the animal has an opportunity to say what it wants to say.’
— Beth Lee-Crowther

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/782668900105060402/unknown.png

2020-11-29 18:11:07 UTC  

Dog whisperer?

2020-11-29 18:11:49 UTC  

Not Cesar Milan

2020-11-29 18:15:50 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/782671180195823696/unknown.png

2020-11-29 18:16:41 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/782671392671399956/unknown.png

2020-11-29 18:17:18 UTC  

"hot dog " whisperer?

2020-11-29 18:17:51 UTC  

I have been able to go through his affidavit and I guarantee it won't stand up under cross examination. He admittedly has no direct proof of anything - no access to machines or any of the actual voting data that would be needed to supply an expert opinion. He only offers conjecture on largely circumstantial evidence. He goes so far as to assert that corporate structures of Dominion and Smartmatic with multiple corporations in multiple countries is indicative of obfuscation of ownership with no proof of that as being the case. His trying to use the NYT election data as proof of fraud is like trying to say it is possible to provide an accurate transcript of a conversation that was overheard by a 3rd party and relayed using a game of telephone. I am working on a breakdown of all of his points and will post it when I am done.

2020-11-29 18:19:22 UTC  

I guarantee you're right and wouldn't waste my time, but that's just me.

2020-11-29 18:23:39 UTC  

He and others are using a methodology very vaguely aken to how APTs are delineated, simply by pattern matching.

2020-11-29 18:27:58 UTC  

But yeah no actual data.. in a secure Computing environment all traffic and unit diagnostic data is recorded and analyzed for patterns. That ain't this....

2020-11-29 18:28:51 UTC  

It's just frustrating watching so-called experts prostituting themselves. I live about and hour and a half from Temecula. I would love to have lunch with the guy and ask him how he came to these conclusions and why he would make such assertions putting his reputation on the line. Alas...with CoVid and fear of reprisals, this will never happen.

2020-11-29 18:35:55 UTC  

Colleagues know that he doesn't have the data to make proper conclusions so no real reputation harm in that system. Other contractors probably recognize it as a paying gig where bias info is required by the client.

2020-11-29 18:36:06 UTC  

I'd argue it's actually a feather in his cap..

2020-11-29 18:36:32 UTC  

Does what he's paid to do, obtaining the outcome desire by the client.

2020-11-29 18:38:25 UTC  

It's one thing to do it for a corporate case or a regular criminal case, it's something completely different when you are doing it to subvert our democracy.

2020-11-29 18:39:16 UTC  

i believe the point of his affidavit is that the rates used with available data are producing statistically impossible outcomes that only benefit democrat districts

2020-11-29 18:39:50 UTC  

I think that is a toxic viewpoint and if you want to prove everyone wrong then open up the data so we can see that this guy is full of shit and his projections were completely wrong

2020-11-29 18:39:56 UTC  

This is all purely for narrative purpose.

2020-11-29 18:40:13 UTC  

he can then be charged under perjury or sued for libel and slander by the company's in question

2020-11-29 18:40:42 UTC  

i just got here but i think i know what you guys are talking about, hopefully

2020-11-29 18:41:01 UTC  

Facts matter little in psyops.

2020-11-29 18:41:30 UTC  

im sick of glow in the dark cia pedophiles subverting our media