Message from @JonM16
Discord ID: 782670170317258772
Lol true
Lol
Wouldn’t be me! I would have lost my cool before I got into office lol
It wasn't on purpose. That's who he is.
@AdamS yes, check out Naomi Klein. She's been professionally barking up that tree for a long, long time.
Do you have a link? Thank you.
Not a particular one, no, but it's an easy search. She has a theory from more than a decade ago but came more prominently into the fray with Trump 2016. It addresses far beyond him and preceded him though.
Thank you. I’ll look it up.
"Shock Doctrine" ~ Naomi Klein
Unfortunately titled
Probably worked at the time lol
Nothing can shock in 2020 🤣
Hahaha
Dr. Kershavarz-Nia
I can see both sides to this, but how does any of this help me?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/joe-bidens-dogs-have-told-this-pet-psychic-a-lot-about-their-beloved-master-and-his-future?ref=home
“The very first thing I got was that they were both very excited about moving to the White House,” Lee-Crowther told The Daily Beast.
Start asking the pet open-ended questions: ‘How are you feeling today?’ ‘What’s your favorite thing to do?’ Nothing too rigid, so the animal has an opportunity to say what it wants to say.’
— Beth Lee-Crowther
Dog whisperer?
"hot dog " whisperer?
I have been able to go through his affidavit and I guarantee it won't stand up under cross examination. He admittedly has no direct proof of anything - no access to machines or any of the actual voting data that would be needed to supply an expert opinion. He only offers conjecture on largely circumstantial evidence. He goes so far as to assert that corporate structures of Dominion and Smartmatic with multiple corporations in multiple countries is indicative of obfuscation of ownership with no proof of that as being the case. His trying to use the NYT election data as proof of fraud is like trying to say it is possible to provide an accurate transcript of a conversation that was overheard by a 3rd party and relayed using a game of telephone. I am working on a breakdown of all of his points and will post it when I am done.
I guarantee you're right and wouldn't waste my time, but that's just me.
He and others are using a methodology very vaguely aken to how APTs are delineated, simply by pattern matching.
But yeah no actual data.. in a secure Computing environment all traffic and unit diagnostic data is recorded and analyzed for patterns. That ain't this....
It's just frustrating watching so-called experts prostituting themselves. I live about and hour and a half from Temecula. I would love to have lunch with the guy and ask him how he came to these conclusions and why he would make such assertions putting his reputation on the line. Alas...with CoVid and fear of reprisals, this will never happen.
Colleagues know that he doesn't have the data to make proper conclusions so no real reputation harm in that system. Other contractors probably recognize it as a paying gig where bias info is required by the client.
I'd argue it's actually a feather in his cap..
Does what he's paid to do, obtaining the outcome desire by the client.
It's one thing to do it for a corporate case or a regular criminal case, it's something completely different when you are doing it to subvert our democracy.
i believe the point of his affidavit is that the rates used with available data are producing statistically impossible outcomes that only benefit democrat districts
I think that is a toxic viewpoint and if you want to prove everyone wrong then open up the data so we can see that this guy is full of shit and his projections were completely wrong
This is all purely for narrative purpose.
he can then be charged under perjury or sued for libel and slander by the company's in question
i just got here but i think i know what you guys are talking about, hopefully
Facts matter little in psyops.
im sick of glow in the dark cia pedophiles subverting our media