I think I may have mentioned before that I have worked with the Entertainment Industry most of my professional career. I have worked with Fox, NBC/Universal, Viacom/Paramount/a division of CBS - I haven't done much with Disney/ABC, though. I've worked with entertainment companies of all sizes since the early 90's. I'm pretty aware of the incestuous nature of the business, in general. More so than most. I also know many of the individuals that work for these companies and they are fine people that are all just trying to do a good job. I don't know the folks at 60 Minutes, though.

If it is censored or withheld it is more likely truthful.

Hasn’t capitalism and democracy co existed for a long time

The people who work within organizations are different from the people who owned the primary equity of the organization.

How does easy accurate sources being censored make it more accurate? Doesnt make sense.

What is this democracy you're talking about?

Mostly that is owned by investment Banks. That tend to own most everything else.

Ah Krebs is fantastic in that interview some common sense applied to the dominion systems. I cant believe folks think they can just death threat their way into vote counts magically changing so weird

"The Kraken" is a Cyber Warfare Program and Military Sting Operation - American Patriot Contact Tracers

http://americanpatriotcontacttracers.com/the-kraken-is-a-cyber-warfare-program-and-military-sting-operation/

The primary issue that I have with this is that it assumes that the shareholders of these companies value ideology over profitability. I don't think that is likely. Even now, Fox News Channel is realigning it's news division in anticipation of trying to be more palatable to the clear majority that voted for Biden. That is not by mistake.

Palatable to the clear majority that voted for Biden does not make the Democrat Party any less captured by their corporate pay masters.

I am no fan of the corporatocracy... Believe me. As an independent, I am well aware that we are only offered candidates that represent two sides of the same coin.

I should say viable candidates.

The same goes for republicans, both so-called parties are wholly owned and operated by corporate oligarchs.

Viable candidate for who's interests? Certainly never the common people.

Yikes Trump finally took an interview since election hes not taking it well

I was just responding to how readily folks will dismiss what Krebs says because he chose to be interviewed on 60 Minutes. Trump said that MSM is bad - echoing what RW talk radio and podcasts have repeated non-stop for 30 years. And while I understand that there is bias on the preferred media of each side, I think Krebs comported himself well and I hope that people will listen to the interview with an open mind.

Viable meaning someone who has a chance of winning. Meaning that Trump and Biden are two sides of the same coin.

@TaLoN132 as previously alluded to what's the guy going to say? If in fact there are election problems. It would be career suicide to admit an issue.

Bernie look like he was someone who could have won where is he now?

Geez Trump said the FBI and DOJ might be involved in the election fraud. The plot thickens?

@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 5!

Almost by Magic two of the worst-performing Democrat candidates in the primary are now in the white house.

@Dedkraken you to know that Hoover ran blackmail operations out of the fbi? If you want to become really disgusted read the coin tell Pro papers .

@busillis There was no need for him to come forward... He was given the reins to a new department in 2018. He could claim that he needs more time to secure states where he experienced opposition. Point to how the Red States went so well. And promise to finish the job before the next election - no problem. Keeps Trump happy, takes credit for what well, and gets a mandate to continue his excellent work. That would have been the path of least resistance. What he ended up doing was to get publicly fired and excoriated by your boss as being incompetent. How in the world would coming forward be the safest path of least resistance for him to follow?

Trump said Stacey Abrams getting legal minorities registered is fraud? Hes willing to just call anything fraud 😂

But he worked so hard to suppress them... They must've cheated.

What kind of country are we living in they can put in the work and convince people to vote that dont vote

Which statement?

Do you actually believe that?

If you are asserting that he is motivated to come forward and lie about the integrity of the election because it would be career suicide not to... Then I do not agree with your premise for the reasons listed above. He could have laid low and been just fine. The riskier move career-wise is to come forward and undermine his boss.

I think theres a difference between Hoover abusing lower and Trump abusing power.

Please don't take this the wrong way but it's a very Pollyannaish worldview.@TaLoN132

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

Man I want the whole interview Fox dont just clip out the sane bits

And this is not an abuse of power?

It may be less cynical, but my explanation is the most pragmatic. Why would being able to declare that you were able to successfully secure 45/50 states in 2 years be a failure???? It would be an amazing accomplishment.

I didnt say it wasnt I said its different

Did you know that the FBI provided explosives for the First World Trade Center bombing?

That's from a New York Times article

The FBI continues operations similar to this even today.