Message from @james j
Discord ID: 784674795140546601
@cheintz, you just advanced to level 1!
Conservatives are closer in behavior and culture to the British they left than modern British people today and other liberals
And the world will continue giving opinions on the US for as long as the US continues to preach democracy & fair elections around the world...but evidently cannot handle it yourselves!
Once we finally clear out a good portion of the swamp rats we will be much better off
You can block me all you like.
Why are you so angry?
Yeah once Trump finally leaves we will be less corrupt @samwisegamgee77
👍
And the right accused the left of being intolerable. lol
Not mad, just don't have the energy to argue any longet
& repeat just showed an example of intolerance to nothing offensive that was said.
What have I said that you feel I’m arguing with you?
Its fine you guys can just vote for Trump in 2024 , watch the new conservatives (trump) station for the next 4 years
That you guys paid for
Blocking is a little kiddish imo
Trump has now taken 200 million for his pac
It doesn’t bother me, just wondering what I said that was so offensive lol
I have outside influence everywhere I look. The ability to block some of it is a godsend
I just ignore people who are unreasonable
I’m reasonable, if one is debating. But evidently everyone is heated.
Even though you are convinced you see fraud
I gave you some great points to look into just surrounding the video, but it seems you have already dismissed it
@Repeat was unable to handle the pressure and blocked me. It’s a first.
Yeah because that’s weak evidence, the facts don’t match the fraud narrative @samwisegamgee77
Did you read the article or not
I joined the debate late, hadn’t seen the points you made.
The video can be taken out of context, but let’s see what the courts say.
If you are willing to open your mind just a bit... I know the conservative twins are often misinformed or hyperbolic and biased, but their coverage of it tonight was along the same track that I've been following and most of what they point out in this case is very true and hard to discredit if you actually look at the events that have taken place.
Disclaimer... I know they are biased, I usually only watch some of their bits for comedic relief, but they called it as it is here
It’s hard to discredit a narrative you have been led to believe for months
All sources should be looked at and one can make ones mind up. I’ll definitely have a look.
I agree with you both on those points
What I'm saying now is, is that entire chain of events not evidence enough to meet the burden to investigate, rather than call it a lack of evidence?
Which is why these groups of maga supporters just writing up affidavits (making a mistake or giving a perspective won’t get you jail time) of what they think is fraud after they have been led to believe trump will win in a land slide. I
Is not really credible
Especially when they write things like “this guys was really big and made me scared”
I’m not saying it shouldn’t be investigated, everything suspicious should be investigated...but before it’s investigated it’s counterproductive to shout from the rooftops “it’s fraud & I’ve won the election”
It’s like being sure someone drinking water is drinking vodka
I dont buy the whole landslide win pitch. Thats trumps hyperbolic ego speaking imo. But we all know his personality
James j, the video shows the later rerunning stacks of ballots though...