im glad they waited until after the election

even though they were sitting on a laptop for over a year

This is disgusting

The Remedy in Law was established a long time ago.

Selfishly I want Orangeman to continue trolling the globalists, so I want him to keep on keeping on. But if there is not proof of widespread fraud, then that’s also a good thing and a margin of trust in the election process is restored

@William Dinan, you just advanced to level 15!

I'm sure he'll be exonerated, if not dear old dad can just pardon me.

They are ALSO investigating James Biden!

@Althea, you just advanced to level 3!

I heard James biden's the man to talk to if you need a political favor.

wonder if this will be used as pretext for impeachment and kamala

Absolutely

Tbh, that was my first thought as well.

It's going to be wall to wall impeachment

He said he would fake a disease and leave the presidency....

id rather have biden then kamala

he at least will be innnefectual

That's been my theory the whole time the senility stick

I would rather have neither

Is a great way to get out of answering questions.

I’d rather have a scarecrow filled with Twizzlers instead of straw than either of them.

i mean thats what biden is

Uncle Joe's having a bad day... Mr FBI agent you can't talk to him.

We need a Special Prosecutor

I'm sure it's in the works.

No, he’s mostly just comprised of dust bunnies and the color beige.

But if they dust off any of the usual dirt bag suspects nothing will come of it.

I wonder what Mueller's up to maybe someone can catch him when he's not in a stupor and inquire.

https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/01/30/howie-carr-muellers-hands-dirty-in-old-fbi-frame-up/

That's more or less where I am... I guess it is somewhere in the middle. The problem is that we no longer have a reliable independent press. Media companies are corporations driven by profit motives - not journalistic ideals. That why I tried looking at it logically and not in the way that one echo chamber or the other wanted me to see it. On the surface, I think that the GroupThink Confirmation Bias explanation is more plausible and requires less mental gymnastics, but being more plausible doesn''t make it a fact. I just hope that people will come to realize that there are multiple viable explanations beyond what they have likely been exposed to.

https://laptrinhx.com/on-this-day-whitey-bulger-sentenced-to-two-terms-of-life-imprisonment-november-14-2013-so-why-the-death-sentence-3573084241/

Ted Kaczynsky did nothing wrong

Not without the House...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3244907/How-Whitey-Bulger-s-politician-brother-Billy-living-South-Boston-house-Black-Mass-mobster-buried-three-victims-gets-200-000-year-pension-despite-taking-Fifth-Amendment-gangster.html

So you advocate for corrupt politicians?

Kayleigh McAcrazy wants everyone to know the odds of Biden winning were 1 in 1000000000000000 ^ 4 and she cannot understand why the media won't cover her totally really facts brought to court.

@TaLoN132 advocates for corruption when party sanctioned.

Eh, I give you a A- on pragmatism. R&R is the closest thing to an unbiased source of commentary I’ve found. MSM (Fox included) is a dying news medium that needs to write striking headlines without alienating their viewership or investors, so no real reporting can happen.
Without news agencies / journalists doing the legwork if falls on independent journalists and then if falls on you the reader to find a second source confirming. That’s why I don’t think the dots will be connected until we are pretty far out from here.
The group think would be wild because Trump would have out swamped the swamp. 🤔

And on the other hand IF there is fraud and IF it can be proved, changes will need to be made and that’s good. Really good for America.

https://www3.bostonglobe.com/metro/1970/01/19/one-lingering-question-for-fbi-director-robert-mueller/613uW0MR7czurRn7M4BG2J/story.html?arc404=true

Not at all... If you are saying that partisan-based retaliatory impeachment hearings are to be expected, then it requires control of the House. I would hope that for any high-crimes and misdemeanors that can be proven, that it would be supported by both parties.

I'll take it... Thanks.