@AdvanceManExtraordinaire SCOTUS is not ruling on the lawfulness of The Legislature Process or Law. They are ruling if the process followed the State Legislation as proscribed under the US Constitution.

I guess every election In history was fraudulent. We never did a month long inquiry to prove it wasn’t fraudulent.

From what I understand that is only one part if the argument. I thought I read in PAs response that they should not disenfranchise good faith voters.

Unfortunately, I believe Reasonable Reliance is not an excuse to violate the Supreme Law of the Land.

James I do not believe it. They broke the constitutional rules.

Our constitution is there for a purpose and you cannot disregard it.

SCOTUS i suppose could also rule that state executives can change election rules at any time. I look forward to someone like desantis all of a sudden saying you need an id and in person voting only in oct 2024

Rules are made to be broken.

~Hunter

Can’t disenfranchise good faith voters!

I have to go watch TimCastIRL, brb after.

I'm shocked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_bZsaNdxEU&t=262s

Basic Separation of Powers and Equal Protection Claim....IMHO

You make some really good points and I agree with 99%. Trump could be pulling off the greatest social/political experiment of all time.. ever, really, that’s some 9D Chess if there is no fraud and he played everyone. The other part of me knows that only after all the dust settles will we really find out why 2020 had so many irregularities and whether it was as cut and dry as many people are arguing that it was. That’s why I resolve to sit back and see how this all shakes out.

It's amazing how people are so quickly some jump on the bandwagon to disparage the first son elect... No civility.

I do agree that state constitutions must be enforced and any state that violated their constitution in running their elections should not be allowed to send electors. The alternative is terrifying.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/09/justice-department-interest-hunter-biden-taxes-444139

im glad they waited until after the election

even though they were sitting on a laptop for over a year

This is disgusting

The Remedy in Law was established a long time ago.

Selfishly I want Orangeman to continue trolling the globalists, so I want him to keep on keeping on. But if there is not proof of widespread fraud, then that’s also a good thing and a margin of trust in the election process is restored

@William Dinan, you just advanced to level 15!

I'm sure he'll be exonerated, if not dear old dad can just pardon me.

They are ALSO investigating James Biden!

@Althea, you just advanced to level 3!

I heard James biden's the man to talk to if you need a political favor.

wonder if this will be used as pretext for impeachment and kamala

Absolutely

Tbh, that was my first thought as well.

It's going to be wall to wall impeachment

He said he would fake a disease and leave the presidency....

id rather have biden then kamala

he at least will be innnefectual

That's been my theory the whole time the senility stick

I would rather have neither

Is a great way to get out of answering questions.

I’d rather have a scarecrow filled with Twizzlers instead of straw than either of them.

i mean thats what biden is

Uncle Joe's having a bad day... Mr FBI agent you can't talk to him.

We need a Special Prosecutor