> I'm sure everybody appreciates your candor.
@busillis Not Lin Wood though. He can go kick rocks.

Channeling catturd2

What did they say when the talking is done the ....

Yes. I'm admitting I don't know the Primary Reason. I don't believe the Record shows it either. Attorney Work Product is not Discoverable and is Privileged.

Wait. Partisan posts? Here in this chat? Sound the alarm.

Hahaha alarm clock. Well done.

or an answer to a Clarion call

This all means something...

Smart people do extremely stupid s***

I was trying to sound it... unfortunately I don't think it makes a noise... you have to imagine. 🙂

Oh man. Got some emoji wizards up in here.

Idk sure doesn't make it practical sense.

They have.... over 50 lawsuits... just that I am aware of.... Lots and lots of rulings by the courts. They were heard out. Then they appealed to the Supreme Court.

They are a Court of Certiorari.... they typically assign one judge and some of their extremely accomplished clerks to review cases that have requested the SCOTUS hear the case.

The overwhelming majority of those cases have Certiorari denied. There are different reasons for this but the most common is that the last court to have ruled on the matter got it Right.

Sometimes the SCOTUS denies Certiorari but one or two of the judges believe that it should have been heard. When that happens they typically write a "decent to the denial of certiorari" - to my knowledge this has not happened.

As such, we can legitimately take notice that the Denial of Cert was Unanimous..... and this SCOTUS is not only extremely conservative Trump appointed a full 1/3 of them....

🧘🏼‍♀️

Zen?

And to not accept that means you don't care for our Rule of Law, System of Government and the Constitution itself.... you think all of that comes second to "Dear Leader"

Hommmmm

Who would want team representing them? Not me.

@JD~Jordan 💯 agree

But why...

If you're right. Why so mad. He'll leave. How much did you charge rent?

Would they be sooo stupid....

Trump appointed judges at every level were like look we will give you far more leeway than this crap deserves but you got nothing 😂

Two went on the Record and said they would Take the Case as a Matter of Law not Merits.

I haven't see that... but that is why as a caveat I said "to my knowledge"

There was 60 cases not counting the bouncing around different courts

I will not pretend to be a lawyer. I just don't believe that anyone could take ALL the evidence and still say the whole thing is baseless. I've watched 2 new videos today with people saying they can do an investigation and tell everyone exactly what happened. The fight coming from the left doesn't make sense if there is nothing to hide... or that's what it looks like from the outside of the situation.

Attorneys aren't going to destroy their reputation on trash. Trump got their family locked in a basement? or what.

Same goes for judges...

Just read the Supreme Court Posting. Thomas and Alito.

Thanks... I will take a look.

The Trump legal team is bringing meritless and baseless claims to court and saying if we prove anything instead of fixing what we proved wed like to flip the results of the entire election. Saying we should just go along with that if theres nothing to hide is absurd.

Maybe they want to go down as stupid.

This has been a Pet Peeve of theirs before.

I don't even care if the election flips or not... I did want Trump to win the election, but at this point I just want to know the truth.

They set the stakes to we just want to steal electors we dont care if theres enough fraud to actually flip a state let alone 4 states we want to steal.

@Zuluzeit I prefer the blind speculation approach....

We do care about that... .why wouldn't anyone care about that?... that's kinda the whole point.

@JD~Jordan. It's their views on Original Jurisdiction.

Would you prefer they don't get smashed in court and then upset people find some other ridiculous way to handle it. Let the slow motion "you lost" movie play out. Because the alternative likely wouldn't have been pretty. If you've noticed as some people "feel" like they're being heard.... They're dropping off. I may have a different ***personal*** criteria than the court system does. I'm not going to pretend as though I didn't witness the biggest steal of an election ever.

But it's about what I feel, its what can be proven in court. Gut feelings don't really fly.

That's what Trumps legal team was stating. Sure Biden won by 100k votes in this state. Sure we can't prove 100k votes of wrongdoing. But if we prove a few hundred votes are off let's kick this bad boy to the state legislature so we cant just win by default. If that's your premise nobody is going to "get your answers". They even tried to steal electors without proving anything in court let alone a much smaller court outcome than would be required.